The First PTEs – Part One – Ashton under Lyne

Not read from the beginning, click here

With its blind already set for the next outward journey, LTC 768 a 1950 H30/26R PD2/3 travels along Warrington Street, unrecognisable today, towards the bus station. Route 128 was originally trolleybus route 217. Haughton Green was a small village beyond Denton which lost its rural aspect in the late 1950s when Manchester built large overspill estates in the area.

The PD2 was one of a batch of 10, originally numbered 2-7, 9, 23, 25 and 76 which were renumbered 1-10 in 1960. The renumbering matched the last number of the registration with the fleet number LTC 770, originally 76, becoming number 10.

The photo was taken after the inception of SELNEC, so the coat of arms and the Gothic fleet name script are missing. The unrepaired tree damage and grubby bonnet were unusual for Ashton and is indicative of many depots’ reaction to the takeover. I travelled to and from primary school many times on this and other vehicles of the batch in 1952 and 1953 on the prestige service 9 between Ashton and Rochdale. In those days the bus was resplendent in the dark blue, white and red livery.

The bus was one of only four operated by SELNEC of the eight that passed to them from Ashton and became 5406 in the fleet, being finally withdrawn in 1970 though it survived in the Mossley Rd garage yard in Ashton blue and cream well into 1974, probably as long as it would have lasted with Ashton.

XTC 854 is a Bond bodied Guy originally fleet number 39 and renumbered to 67 in 1964. One of four H32/28R Guy Arab IVs originally bought in 1956 specifically for the number 14 Ashton to Mossley service which, with its long drag up to the Hartshead area from Ashton and the even harder, sharp ascent from Mossley, gave problems to the Leylands in the fleet.

Bond was a short lived but highly reputable body builder in Wythenshawe, Manchester. Ashton was its biggest customer with rebodied and new trolleybuses as well as the Guys. With its preferred body builders Crossley and Leyland either out of or about to leave the marketplace, Bond looked set to gain Ashton’s future business – as well as many other customers – but labour disputes ruined the company and Ashton had to look elsewhere.

All four passed to SELNEC – the only Guys in the fleet, though Bolton contributed some Bond bodied Leylands – and this bus became 5467. Photographed on the western edge of Ashton Bus Station the bus is devoid of any logo, crest or title to the offside observer. I’ve not found a confirmed withdrawal date for the batch but memory says 1971, again in blue and cream, as part of SELNEC’s determination to reduce the average age of the fleet, slightly frustrated by the delay in delivery of Fleetlines and Atlanteans.

Following the demise of Bond, Ashton followed its next door neighbour, Oldham, to Crossgates, Leeds and for the next four batches of double deckers ordered 65 seat traditional bodies on PD2/40 chassis with traditional radiators. 19 NTD was number 19 in the fleet from the first batch delivered in 1960. 1965 saw a fifth batch but with the forward entrance version of the body on PD2/37 chassis.

Ashton followed Oldham in another regard in so far as, in the last days of its independence it placed the coat of arms and script on the between decks forward panels and, in Ashton’s case, the legal lettering followed “upstairs”.

Photographed on Portland St, Manchester, on the southern edge of Piccadilly Gardens and bus station, 19 is on former trolleybus service 218 from Stalybridge via Ashton and Ashton Old Rd.

19 became 5419 in the SELNEC fleet and was repainted in fleet colours though it didn’t survive into GMT days, having a much shorter life than envisioned by either its makers or its original owner.

Though Ashton’s fleet was relatively small, never exceeding 50 vehicles, it moved with the times. In 1966 it took eight Atlanteans bodied by Roe and followed these with a batch of PDR1A/1 Atlanteans in 1969 bodied by Northern Counties to H43/28D fitted for OMO.

The last of these was PTF 861G, fleet number 61 which was delivered after the inauguration of SELNEC in basic Ashton colours with SELNEC Southern legal lettering. Taken on Penny Meadow, Ashton, the birthplace of actress Amanda Barrie, 61 is already grubby though it has reflective number plates, legalised just before delivery. Eventually becoming 5461 and gaining SELNEC livery the bus survived until 1982 by which time it was part of the GMT fleet.

After the formation of SELNEC, a number of outstanding orders from the constituent Corporations were delivered in SELNEC livery, some had details amended by the new operator prior top delivery, others were – colour scheme apart – to the standard
specified by the departments which ordered them. Ashton had a repeat batch of Northern Counties bodied Atlanteans to the same specification as the 1969 batch on order for 1970. Five were ordered but only four were delivered these being VTE 162H to VTE 165H and these appeared as 5462-5465. A further order to the same specification was placed for 1971 but this and the last one of the 1970 order were cancelled with Northern Counties and the six PDR1A/1 chassis received newly designed Northern Counties bodies to SELNEC’s new standard design, serving as single doorway prototypes. Originally numbered EX1-EX6, they later became 5466-5471 having the Manchester registrations PNF 941J-PNF 946J.

The last bus built to Ashton’s specifications, VTE 165H is a Northern Counties bodied H43/28D PDR1A/1 Atlantean delivered in 1970. Numbered 5465 I suspect it is turning close to the bus station. The all Leyland double decker in the background is a bit of a mystery. It isn’t ex Ashton as it has sliding vents rather than half drop windows. Is it a canteen as the earlier facilities opposite the fire station closed when the new bus station opened and I have a nagging feeling it was a while before facilities opened at the new site.

Copy by Phil Blinkhorn – Photographs by Roger Cox

08/2013

 

Click here to view Part Two – SHMD Board

 


03/08/13 – 07:15

One note regarding SELNEC fleet numbers. Only one Ashton bus carried its SELNEC fleet number on the blue livery and this was the last repaint into the blue livery, PD2 5436. Buses were only renumbered on repaint and of the SELNEC constituents Ashton was unique in this regard.

A couple of minor points. Oldham changed their livery but continued hand painting into GMT days. I believe the only municipal spray facilities were those in Manchester and Rochdale and brush painting remained the norm elsewhere.

There is also a typo in the SELNEC number of the first vehicle featured which was allocated the number 5408. Ironically the bus that would have been 5406 was the only one of the batch to gain orange livery, but this had been cut down as a towing vehicle just before the formation of SELNEC. It was preserved for a time, as also was sister 7. It’s a real shame the latter didn’t survive as they looked magnificent in original livery.

David Beilby


03/08/13 – 07:17

I was a member of a group who tried to preserve one of the Leyland bodied PD2s.This was on a farm somewhere in darkest Lancashire.We went one Saturday and after a long time using a farm tractor we managed to get the bus to start .The leader of the group the late John Leadbeater drove lorrys for a company in Batley West Yorkshire and he was given permission to park the bus at the depot Alas shortly afterwards before any serious work could be carried out John had to leave and so the bus had to go too.I think efforts were made to find another home but this was fruitless and so the bus went to PVS at Barnsley.I cannot remember the bus registration but I do recall Downing Street on the destination blind.

Philip Carlton


03/08/13 – 07:18

For clarification does the reference to ‘George Hilditch’ refer to G G Hilditch, who held various posts in the ‘municipal bus industry’, latterly being the General Manager at Leicester City Transport, and who generally titled himself as Geoffrey Hilditch?

Michael Elliott


03/08/13 – 08:00

Thanks for your comments David. Re painting, Manchester and Rochdale certainly had spray booths and as far as I remember, so did North Western. I’m surprised about Oldham as I understood the dreadful pommard and cream was sprayed. Before I write the piece on Salford can anyone confirm the simplification of the livery to a single cream stripe and overall green was to, as I’ve understood it for years, allow simple spraying.

Phil Blinkhorn


03/08/13 – 09:43

Michael, you’ve picked up an error missed by three of us who read the proof!

Phil Blinkhorn


05/08/13 – 08:13

One point not made in the text but highlighted by the last two pictures is that the Smallshaw Circular and the Hurst Circular followed the same route but in opposite directions.

The routes involved some long flat stretches and some steady but fairly easy climbs. Heavily loaded at peak periods as Smallshaw and Hurst contained 1920s council houses where many workers from the town and Manchester resided, the routes passed the depot and were the nominated running in turns for new and off maintenance vehicles as no part of the routes was more than ten minutes drive from the depot.

Phil Blinkhorn


05/08/13 – 08:13

I was at first surprised to read that Ashton’s Guys were purchased to cope with hills that Leylands were having difficulty with, since Gardner’s 8.4 litres were never a match for Leyland’s 9.8. But then I remembered once reading something similar about Northern General using 5HLW-powered Guy single deckers on their hilliest routes. This cannot be about performance, so I can only assume it’s something to do with Gardners staying cool when other engines get all hot and bothered.

Whatever the reason, they sounded very nice, and I also liked the Bond bodies very much. In retrospect they remind me of earlier de-Manchesterised Crossley bodies, as shown at this link.

Peter Williamson


05/08/13 – 10:41

Peter, you may well be right regarding the cooling. I had cousins of a similar age who lived in Hazelhurst overlooking the route and I spent many weekend and summer holiday days with them. Before the Guys arrived I recall seeing overheated Leylands pulled in on the Mossley side of the Gorsey Lane, Mossley Rd junction eventually being “refreshed” by the staff of the adjacent motor repair garage.

In addition to regular traffic Hartshead Pike, for which the stop was at the highest point on the route, was a great draw for people at weekends and during the summer so loads were often heavy. As I recall the Guys were the only type that didn’t appear on the 1 and 3 Circulars during their initial running in.

Phil Blinkhorn


28/08/13 – 06:00

I recall the “mystery bus” in the background of the photo of 5465. It was an ex Bolton all-Leyland PD2 which was converted to a mobile church. It spent quite some time in Ashton.

John Hibbert


28/08/13 – 12:32

Thanks for clearing that up John

Phil Blinkhorn


29/08/13 – 06:40

I am a native of Rochdale and discovered the buses of Ashton Corporation when I started to attend Secondary School (Rochdale Technical) which was in Rochdale town centre.

I always remember the destination blinds of Ashton buses which were ‘economical’ with their text. Buses arrived in Rochdale showing ‘Rochdale via Oldham’. On departing they would show ‘Via Oldham Ashton’. The ‘Via Oldham’ being the same words displayed in both directions. The conductor would only have to make a minimal number of turns of the destination blind winder making Rochdale disappear and Ashton show up.

In Phil’s article there are two photos illustrating another example of the sharing of destination blind text in the word ‘Circular’ which was shared as ‘Hurst Circular’ on one hand and ‘Circular Smallshaw’ on the other.

No doubt there were various other examples on the Ashton blinds. Another operator serving Rochdale that used this method of using shared text was Hebble.

David Slater


29/08/13 – 10:41

The practice of saving space on blinds in this manner was not uncommon. Manchester, for instance, did something similar on the via blinds using 5 lines to cover 6 points. Thus, a outward journey of service #40 would show ‘Victoria Park, Birch Park, Kingsway’ and inward would show ‘Kingsway, Birch Park, Victoria Park’.

Orla Nutting


11:08

John,

I wonder if this mobile church was ex-Bolton 408 (DBN 311) which was sold to “Gospel Bus, Norley, Frodsham” in March 1966, and is now preserved.

For a while this owner had ex-Aldershot & District AEC Reliance/Weymann 370 (XHO 370), which I photographed in a field in Frodsham on 30/12/1986.

It later moved to Northern Ireland and later to preservation in A&D livery, having been exchanged for a single-deck Atlantean TBK 197K, ex-Portsmouth. See it at this link.

Dave Farrier


29/08/13 – 19:14

Manchester via blinds came in 3 varieties until 1958: totally informative with 3 waypoints listed, the partially informative such as Limited Stop and All Night Service (which to the initiated indicated that double fare was in operation) or the confusingly hopeless where a blank portion of the blind was shown and, of course, the equally opaque use of the word FOG, meant to show the bus was running off the time table due to fog somewhere (normally in the suburbs) but which meant nothing to the intending passenger. The 1958 opening of the Kingsway extension and the use of the road to bypass the log jam that was Cheadle village led to route 1, which always showed Limited Stop, being split into the 161 and 162. This created a new subset on Parrs Wood depot via blinds which could then be set to show Limited Stop via Cheadle for the former or Limited Stop via Kingsway for the latter.

There was some intelligent use of the via blinds for football specials with destinations of Old Trafford and Maine Rd, both of which appeared on the destination blinds for service buses, the latter being a short working point on the 123 when it was converted from the 213 trolleybus service, rather than Moss Lane East which had been the trolleybus short working. The football specials had special fares and would, even when not full, ignore ordinary passengers at bus stops. The destination blind would thus be set to Football Match and the via blind would show either Old Trafford or City Ground (strangely not Maine Rd!)

Orla’s explanation of the use of the blinds when 3 waypoints were shown is as the system was supposed to be used but there is a mass of photo evidence to show many crews couldn’t be bothered about turning the blind handle even one revolution and the blinds are often seen as set in reverse direction to the service.

Phil Blinkhorn


12/05/14 – 09:01

The Guy Arab IVs were withdrawn in 1970.

The 4th photo, of No.61 is on Warrington Street, not on Penny Meadow.

The 5th photo, shows VTE 165H turning from Warrington Street into the bus station.

The Guys were not the only type that didn’t appear on circulars 1 and 3 on initial running in turns. The front entrance PD2s, the Roe bodied Atlanteans and single deckPanther Cubs did not.

Dave Ward


13/05/14 – 08:50

Thanks Dave for your clarification re the withdrawal date for the Guys. Your comment re the running in turns surprises me, apart from the Panther Cubs perhaps, as the Guys were such a notable exception to the norm and, apart from my own information, I’ve seen the same statements about running in turns elsewhere.

Thanks also for correcting the location of photo #4.

Phil Blinkhorn


14/05/14 – 06:11

Besides being parked in the Mossley Road depot on delivery, the first time I saw the front entry PD2s in service was on the 127 Haughton Green and 30 Edgeley services. They very rarely ventured on to the circular services. And if they did, were replaced assoon as a rear platform PD2became available The Roe bodied Atlanteans were known as “trolleybus replacement vehicles” and entered service on the 218/219 from new. They did not appear on the circulars until one man operation commenced. The Letters of their registration numbers was YTE, the same as the trolleybuses that they replaced. The Panther Cubs were used on the 4 to Park Bridge and the 2 Gambrel Bank Circular and after one man operation commenced were the normal Sunday vehicle on the 14 Mossley service.

Dave Ward


14/05/14 – 08:29

The Panther Cubs appeared on the 5 (Droylsden to Smallshaw) service when new and I rode on them from Droylsden to Ashton as part of a more convoluted route home from school occasionally.

David Beilby


15/05/14 – 07:45

David.
The 5 Droylsden service was the first to be converted to omo in 1967, which is the year the Panther Cubs were delivered. They were E registered, meaning they were registered prior to 1st August. 1967 is also the year of the creation of route 2 Gambrel Bank Circular, which was single deck operated from the outset by the Panther Cubs. Only one vehicle was required. As I recall,the service was not an all day service, which enabled the same vehicle to operate the equally infrequent 4 to Park Bridge. Whilst not doubting that the Panther Cubs appeared on the 5, the first of the 1966 Atlanteans had been fitted for omo in 1967 for service 5, which was Ashton’s first omo service of that era.

The first new vehicles would usually appear on 3, Hurst Circular, appearing on 1, Smallshaw Circular the following day. Two vehicles were required for each circular route. I recall that when I first moved to Ashton that two of the 1955 (UTB) PD2s at that time the newest Leylands in the fleet) would be on one circular with two of the 1950 (LTC), PD2s on the other. This then changed every other day, with the vehicle type changing circular. eg: UTBs on Hurst Circular and LTBs on Smallshaw Circular on a Monday with Tuesday finding a pair of UTBs on the Smallshaw and a pair of LTCs on the Hurst, then Wednesday as Monday. When the first Roe PD2/40s were delivered in 1960, this arrangement continued with a pair of them alternating every other day with a pair of the UTB batch Crossley PD2/12s. From 1962, with the delivery of the second batch of the RoePD2/40s, this practice continued, but both circulars had RoePD2/40s operating them. However, as I already mentioned, this practice ceased with the delivery of the front entry Roe PD2/37 in 1965, these vehicles not entering service and saw little use on the circulars.

I have a theory regarding new vehicles and their initial entry to service on the circular routes and why this practice changed in 1965. It possibly had nothing to do with running in turns.

T.P. O’Donnell became General Manager at Ashton in 1954. When I returned to live in Ashton in 1957, O’Donnell lived just four houses from where my family lived on Broadoak Road. He left Ashton for Northampton in either 1963 or 1964. 1964 was the year the last Roe PD2/40 rear platform were delivered and the last to enter service on the Smallshaw and Hurst Circulars. Was it O’Donnell who insisted that at least two of his newest buses operated past his house every day, a practice that started from his arrival in 1954 and ended when he left in 1963/4? We shall probably never know, but it is a possibility.

Dave Ward


15/05/14 – 17:43

Dave may well have a point about Mr O’Donnell and the use of new vehicles on the circulars. This could be amplified by the fact that the first vehicle in the peacock livery, a GTJ registered Crossley, appeared on both routes just prior to Christmas 1954 on what had been Leyland territory for some while. Mr O’D showing off to the neighbours?

After he left things may well have changed but I rode on 45 on the 1 and 42 on the 3 when a few days old in 1965. This may have been a case of depot staff following tradition, at this remove we will probably never know.

Phil Blinkhorn


21/06/14 – 15:28

I suspect the photo of LTC 768 showing “Haughton Green 128” shouldn’t take long to put a date to. I spent the first 44 years of my life domiciled in Haughton Green, and seem to remember the 128 variation only being introduced in the late 60s, towards the end of both Ashton Corpy’s separate existence, and of the bus pictured. Technically, trolleybus 217 – and who’d have thought a “rural village” could justify the investment of trolleys instead of motorbuses – became motorbus 127 in 1960, when buses simply ran up Two Trees Lane and turned right onto Haughton Green road, before turning round opposite the Jolly Hatters and returning whence it came. The council “overspill” estate necessitated the introduction of circulars, with the 127 continuing clockwise round the estate, and anti-clockwise journeys introduced as 128s. Around 1980, Greater Manchester Transport renumbered them 347/348 respectively, and de-reg resulted in the 348 being dropped in favour of a “frequent intervals” 347 as it is now.
Interesting to note also that the front entrance PD2s were initially allocated to 127s in favour of Ashton locals. By SELNEC days, when “standard” Fleetlines stuck rigidly to buses heading North out of the bus Station, and the 127/128 never seeing anything newer than the EXx Atlanteans until the arrival of the superb Scanias for the Trans-Lancs Express.

Phil Longdon


21/11/14 – 06:30

I was brought up in Ashton in the 60’s and lived in Cedar Street, Kenworthy Avenue (Hurst) and latterly Willshaw Lane.
My earliest memory was the number 7 running along Curzon Road and Kings Road operated by old wartime Guys, rebodied by Roe in the fifties, until replaced by the all Leyland Titans.
We moved to Hurst so used the Circulars or the 7 to get into town. The Roe bodied PD2s with rear entrances were the usual vehicles but I do recall catching, only once, a forward entrance version. The number 5 initially had the single deckers in use and later the Trolley Bus replacement Atlanteans.
The number 2 started after we moved to Willshaw Lane. A variety of vehicles were used on this including the Guy Arab/Bond vehicles, all Leyland PD2s, PD2/Roes and the two single deckers.
I own the surviving PD2/Roe rear entrance vehicle no. 39, which has been stored securely under cover for a number of years, and I am hoping to start its restoration shortly.

David Wilson


16/11/15 – 06:26

Just revisited this page after quite a while:-

PD2 no.8 survived longer than the other three because it became a driver trainer.

Route 5 was the first “one man” route (to use contemporary description!) and was initially operated by the two Panther Cubs. I lived at the village store in Littlemoss at the time and as a young boy was greatly impressed with their “luxury” compared to the PD2/3s of the 1-10 batch which had been the regular performers. Prior to the permitting of double deck one person operation, the 1966 Atlanteans were later used in a cunning scheme where the top decks were closed off by way of a wooden panel at the bottom of the stairs making a single decker for legal purposes – the panel being easily removable to return the bus to its full capacity. Route 5 needed two vehicles for its regular timetable, which would have made it the ideal choice for the conversion.

Another feature of the route which I recall is that for several weeks prior to their withdrawal in December 1966 the last two utility Guys, 72 and 74, were the regular all day performers in place of the usual PD2s, having been “spare” buses for some time.

John Hibbert


06/03/16 – 06:37

A couple of points from the excellent Ashton article. Regarding the appearances of newer/recently overhauled buses on the 1 and 3 Circulars I was always led to believe that this was in part due to the fact that quite a number of Ashton councillors lived on the routes. This bolstered by the fact that Mr O Donnell also lived on Broadoak Road makes sense. The practice continued under Mr Griffiths tenure.

As for those 4 Bond bodied Guy Arab IVs as a lad I remember them appearing on an evening peak trip from Guide Bridge into Ashton and then right through onto the 7 route to Hazelhurst. I frequently caught them home to the top of Hazelhurst after trainspotting trips to Guide Bridge station. I cannot recall what route number they displayed. A photo of 67 on Kings Road returning to Ashton after one of these trips is attached. This was taken after the formation of SELNEC as it has lost the coat of arms.

I also have vivid memories of the Crossley re-bodied Austerity Arabs on the 7 running past our house with bonnet side panels resting on the nearside wings for extra cooling in summer.This seems to contradict the idea of them being used on the 14 because they ran cooler than the Leylands. I was once told that the Leylands struggled up out of Brookbottom if they had to stop halfway up. This was because of the difficulty of starting in 1st gear and making the change to 2nd on the hill without losing momentum.

A final memory is that no. 5 out of the LTC batch of Leylands was converted to a run around/tow wagon and spent much of its time in the bus station with compressed air bottles to rescue ailing Atlanteans suffering with air system problems.

Steve Hyde


07/03/16 – 06:15

A new entry in the comments area prompts a new study of previous ones! Dave Ward and Phil Blinkhorn wondered a while back about a Manager’s insistence that his newest buses should be on the route passing his house (or not, as the case may be!)

There was a vaguely similar situation in Southampton a few years back, involving a bus stop and a disabled parking bay. One of the Transport Department’s Inspectors lived at the house in question, and he wanted a stop outside his house, for ease of getting to and from work. His wife had what was then an orange badge, and there was no parking facility at the property. The lady went out to work, and used the car to go to and from her work, so the bay was vacant during the day, when the buses were running, but occupied in the evening, when they were not.

In those days, rules on the issue of parking bays, and who was allowed to use them was far more ‘regulated’ than it is now. It might seem strange, but this arrangement worked. It shouldn’t have of course but that’s like the bumble bee and the laws of physics and aerodynamics. Theoretically, the bee can’t fly but nobody’s told it, so it does!

Pete Davies


19/04/16 – 06:20

I drove buses from Ashton depot for over 10 yrs, the bus pictured in SELNEC colours number 5465 on the hurst circular route had quite a chequered history. It constantly had braking issues when carrying heavy loads down hill. As I was a union rep, eventually we refused to drive it and it was black listed. Many years later and living in N. Wales a driver with GMT was suing them after getting injured when the brakes failed on 5465 and wanted me to give evidence for him.

Larry Smith

The First PTEs – The Beginning of the End for the Corporation Bus – SELNEC – Introduction

For almost 80 years the Corporation Bus was a fixture in many cities, towns and even rural areas around the United Kingdom. A low cost social transport service providing for many councils a nett income generator, the colour schemes and coats of arms carried were as much an identifier of the locale as the buildings and infrastructure they passed and used every day. The vehicles were often the objects of civic pride and, certainly, rivalry – sometimes friendly, sometimes not – between General Managers and Engineers in adjoining areas.

Some Corporations were loyal to a chassis builder and a body builder, often for many years. Others spread their custom, sometimes to deal with specific operational needs where a favoured builder couldn’t meet these from its catalogue, sometimes to ensure continuity of supply in an industry where vehicle builders came and went and sometimes because General Managers were true innovators and experimenters such as George Hilditch and Edgley Cox.

I was born and brought up in the conurbation that became Greater Manchester. The area was rich in operators and even the relatively small town of Ashton under Lyne where I spent the first nine years of my life, had regular services provided by no fewer than six Corporations, two BET operators, one Joint Committee and its roads also hosted a number of coaches passing through on services where the operators had no licence to pick up or drop off in the Borough. The colour schemes alone were enough to attract the attention of a four year old. Ashton had its patriotic dark blue, white and red. Stockport’s smart red and off white was almost duplicated by North Western’ s red and off white. Manchester’s red and cream was almost as predominant as Ashton’s blue, mainly on trolleybuses with just the long distance number 6 joint service between Manchester and Glossop being motor bus operated.

The dark green, cream and silver of what everyone called the “Joint Board”, though the word “Joint” never appeared in the official title of what was originally the Stalybridge, Hyde, Mossley and Dukinfield Tramways and Electricity Board – later to have the word “Tramways” replaced by “Transport” – contrasted with the maroon and white of Oldham and the blue and cream streamlined Rochdale scheme whilst, from over the hills in Yorkshire, the Borough was treated to the red and cream of Yorkshire Traction and the cream with a dash of blue from Sheffield.

The sense of permanence generated by these operators, particularly the local Corporations, was solid by the time I started school in 1952 but change was not long in coming. Just 26 months after my starting school a new General Manager arrived at Ashton and swept away the patriotic scheme with a peacock blue and cream design. SHMD shortly afterwards changed their scheme to an overall lighter green with scant cream relief and Manchester, Rochdale, North Western and, finally, Oldham all succumbed to the needs of the hot spray paint booth and simplified, and in most cases, downgraded their schemes. Only Stockport, to where we had moved in 1956, maintained its traditional scheme – the only nod to modernity being the replacement of the light brown lining out with black.

As the private car, diesel prices, wages, changes in entertainment, not to mention the cost of new buses impacted the industry as the 1950s gave way to the seeming new era of the 1960s, many Corporations started to find their bus operations were becoming less profitable – though by no means something to be given up.

National Government thought otherwise and the 1968 Transport Act established five Passenger Transport Executives in Glasgow, Tyneside, Merseyside, West Midlands and the largest, SELNEC PTE, which stood for South East Lancashire and North East Cheshire Passenger Transport Executive, based on Manchester.

There are many arguments for and against the formation of the PTEs. I’ve no intention of examining them here. Suffice to say that what came into effect between October 1 1968 and June 1 1973 was the beginning of the end for the Corporation bus in all but a few municipalities in the United Kingdom – and the few that are left are “arms length” organisations after the disastrous interference of Nicholas Ridley’s bus deregulation under Thatcher in 1986 – proving both major parties are more interested in dogma than reality when it comes to transport.

Whilst between before 1968 few people would have given more than a passing glance to the buses on their streets, the advent of the PTEs generated quite a reaction in terms of loss of local identity – and this still pertains to some extent with today’s monolithic operators regularly inventing logos or variations on their national schemes to engender local loyalty, with varying degrees of success.

One area worthy of looking at is what happened to some of the vehicles involved, many of which faced shortened lives, radically altered colour schemes and, in the run up to, and often for a good while after vesting day, a reduction in maintenance, running in partial colour schemes and transfer from the depots of original owners to those in far flung parts of their new operator.

Roger Cox recorded this period in parts of the SELNEC area in which I lived and went to school. The following photographs illustrate not only the period but some of the schemes that were lost, the standard of vehicle maintenance and the effect of the new sunglow orange and cream on a number of very familiar types.

Copy by Phil Blinkhorn – Photographs by Roger Cox

08/2013

 Click here to view Part One – Ashton under Lyne

Fascinating Aspects of Scheduling at Samuel Ledgard

Have you ever wondered how the buses and the crews reached their home depots at night?? Well usually there was no problem as the service timetable worked out suitably, but occasionally some interesting little tricks had to be devised and could be incorporated into the duties at any available time of the day.

Take for example the 05:50 from Otley to Leeds where the corrective measure was taken at the earliest possible opportunity. If this bus had stayed on the service timings all day it would have ended up at Armley Depot at night. So, on arriving in Leeds at 06:25, the bus stood for thirty minutes instead of the usual ten, being replaced on the 06:35 departure from Cookridge Street by the Armley machine fresh from the garage, and leaving for Otley at 06:55. A little later the Armley machine would provide a useful duplicate between Otley and Newall, chiefly for Prince Henry’s Grammar School, in its twenty minutes layover time between 08:30 and 08:50. Later still at 22:10 the same bus would convey Otley Depot administrative paperwork to Armley for prompt attention next morning.

Turning now to the 06:05 from Burley in Wharfedale to Leeds via Guiseley which was an Ilkley Depot duty and ran private to Burley at 05:55 – we never understood why passengers could not be carried on that stretch (although the odd “stowaway” was not unknown!!). However the rest day for that duty was Tuesday, when it was staffed by Otley Depot. The vehicle logistics question was solved quite easily – on Monday evenings the 20:00 from King Street to Ilkley, which on other days ran in to Ilkley Depot, was simply taken by the finishing crew to Otley Depot ready for Tuesday morning – to the relief of the night cleaner at Ilkley who’s work was reduced by 20% for a once weekly treat.

Certainly the most ambitious of these remedial measures involved buses from Otley and Armley Depots on the Leeds – Guiseley – Ilkley service. The route basically required four buses on a two hour round trip, one vehicle from Armley and three from Otley. The Leeds Depot bus left King Street at 06:00 and remained on that timing until 14:53 when it was taken to Ilkley Garage. There the crew had a half hour break before taking over an Otley Depot bus at 15:25 for a trip to Leeds and return for 17:23 when the vehicle was handed to a fresh late turn Otley crew. Meanwhile another Otley crew collected the Armley bus from Little Lane Depot and worked a very busy duplicate journey at 16:22 to Leeds and back. This arrangement was very pleasing to me and other enthusiasts as it enabled us to work on a large variety of Armley buses over the years. After an hour’s break at Ilkley from 17:23 to 18:23 the Leeds staff reclaimed their vehicle for the 18:25 to Leeds, the bus being now in the right place on the service to run in to Armley at night. As a happy reminder of the days when passengers were legion it is good to remember the scene at the wooden GPO parcels office in King Street in the weekday evening peak. At 17:20 two Hebble buses would leave for Halifax and Burnley/Rochdale, making room for a most impressive Ledgard quartet – all well loaded – which departed thus :- 17:27 to Rawdon Co-op, 17:28 to Guiseley White Cross, 17:29 (Armley “borrowed” bus) to Ilkley and 17:30 to Ilkley. Oh to see such a splendid procession now!!

The service from Ilkley to Otley was, of course, jointly operated with West Yorkshire and consequently the Ledgard bus stood at various times for seventy minutes in Ilkley. On Wednesdays and Saturdays this provided the means for operating the Middleton Hospital visitors’ journeys very economically indeed – imagine nowadays reversing with almost a full load onto the narrow Northern end of the Toll Bridge on the outward trips!!
The only “sleeping out” arrangement that I can recall involved the last “B & B” departure from Bradford which terminated in Otley at 22:55. The crew would leave the vehicle in the bus station and travel home on the last journey at 23:00 (22:30 from Harrogate). The bus was re-fuelled and cleaned by the Otley night staff and parked near the Bradford stand ready for the 07:00 journey next morning, the crew for which travelled from “Wool City” on the first departure arriving in Otley at 06:55.

Economy in operation was always taken seriously at Ledgard’s and so one notable apparent exception puzzles me to this day. The Weston Estate service was extended from its original terminus at Bickerton Way (where reversing was needed) right round the newly built and heavily populated Meagill Rise to a new turning point in a narrow slip road which was frequently obstructed by parked cars (reasonably so to be fair as the householders had nowhere else to park). The location was within but a few yards of re-joining Weston Drive and presented what would appear an ideal opportunity to operate as a circular loop at the outer end of the route with quite a saving in fuel over a year. I imagine that the possibility of overloading occurring from the combination of outward and newly joining passengers may well have been the reason for this caution, and the “loop” measure was not adopted till many years later when “another operator” took over the route.

In closing, two observations on the change in public standards over recent years spring to mind. Firstly, can anyone imagine today that buses could be left parked all day and by night in Otley Bus Station without fear of damage or theft. Or that the entire cash takings at Ilkley Depot, inside the relevant Setright machine boxes, travelled to Otley to be counted under the steps of the 19:40 and 23:25 buses from Ilkley – passengers galore AND open platforms!! Makes you think doesn’t it??

Chris Youhill

09/2013


22/09/13 – 17:12

Chris has given all of us a great insight to bus service operations which I have found of great interest and enjoyment. As a resident of Burley-in -Wharfedale and a pupil at Prince Henry’s Grammar School, Otley I used the “Sammy” buses on a regular basis and I got to know the Otley and Ilkley buses well, so the “strangers” were always spotted. Just as Chris enjoyed the change of bus, so did people like me. The article brings back very many fond memories of this time in the fifties/early sixties. Many thanks Chris for such a lovely article.

Richard Fieldhouse


22/09/13 – 17:13

Many thanks, Chris, for this fascinating glimpse into an often neglected aspect of bus operation – particularly of “Sammies”. Back in the days when every fare was important, every effort was made to grab as many riders as possible and these clever and money-saving schedules helped maximise income. It’s ironic to think that, in those perhaps more socialist, union-influenced days, operators were extremely savvy in ways they could maximise income, whereas in today’s more laissez-faire, de-restricted atmosphere, income is almost secondary to subsidy and the levels of service reflect this.

Paul Haywood


23/09/13 – 06:08

Thank you indeed Richard and Paul for your appreciative views of what is to me a most intriguing part of bus operation. I should have mentioned of course that this article was based on the Monday to Friday situation at Otley and Ilkley depots. Naturally the Saturday and Sunday rotas, due to the simpler demands and frequencies, were less complex. I imagine that similar “crafty tactics” were in force at Armley and Bradford depots too, although at Yeadon Moorfield the vehicles’ return to their proper home at night was ensured simply by the frequency and nature of the two Otley – Horsforth services.

Chris Youhill


23/09/13 – 06:09

Very interesting Chris.

Could you please explain to a local lad (not as local as Richard) the route to Middleton Hospital and why in particular it required a reverse at the toll bridge.

Gordon Green


23/09/13 – 10:21

Well Gordon I’ll certainly try to explain this challenging oddity on the Middleton Hospital service. The crux of the matter lay in the very limited visiting hours for the Hospital, and in the long and difficult journeys made by many of the visitors. Visiting times were 1400 – 1600 on Wednesdays, Saturdays and Sundays only – therefore it was an enormous help to those travelling from the east direction to leave their long distance buses at the Toll Bridge and to walk across to the Hospital (north) end. This brings us to the difficult reversing performance from a very narrow country road onto an even narrower “fluted stone” entrance to the bridge – with an upward slope to add to the fun. It was a very difficult job dimension wise and the absolute limit was definitely reached with 27 ft x 8 ft double deckers. Then, as is widely known, with manual transmission especially, reversing while loaded involves an amount of “jigging up and down” to add to the precision required. Of course having accomplished the turn we were then faced with more waiting passengers than we should take, but we never left anyone – how could you really ?? This brings us now to the ascent of Carter’s Lane to the Hospital – the last few yards were of a really terrific gradient, culminating in the final thrill of the trip in the form of a steeply curved steep entry to the Grounds (still there actually on the demolished site) where platform and rear offside grounding had to be carefully avoided. It is a real tribute to the moderate engine capacity of the 7.4 litre Leylands and 7.7 litre AECs, and to the Ledgard maintenance, that the often very overloaded vehicles managed the ascent with 100% reliability – always of course in first gear in the end.

One other real hazard on the outward journeys from Ilkley concerned the cables for the suspension footbridge near the Lido – the cables were anchored at the nearside of the road and it was critically essential to pull over to the right to avoid an accident to the top deck of the bus. It may be wondered why the return journeys to Ilkley were direct – obviously the passengers had achieved their visiting hours target and therefore there was no justification for the Toll Bridge reversing and traffic disruption. Oh, if only a photo had been taken of the Toll Bridge reverse – I remember well my terror of the moment when, as a very new driver, I had to face it with an audience of bemused passengers.

Chris Youhill

Northern General Transport Percy Main Depot – Part Three

Not read Part Two click here

A handful of Percy Main’s service vehicles carried the Wakefields name, and we’ve seen a couple of examples, but we turn now to the other side of their operations, they also had a superb fleet of coaches. I don’t think it ever exceeded twenty in number, but they were always immaculately presented and meticulously maintained. Up to the late 50’s, most of the coaches were laid up during the in winter months, but with the growing popularity of Northern’s Express service routes, and demand for seats often exceeding supply, the practice of de-licensing was discontinued, and Wakefields vehicles could frequently be found working these routes as duplicates ‘on hire’ to Northern.

Although these weren’t Wakefields first coaches, I cant trace any earlier vehicles. They had eight of these hansom Duple Coronation C30F coaches. Four 1938 Leyland Tiger TS8’s – FT 4544/7 – 104/7; and four AEC Regals – FT 49?? – 108/111 from 1939. They had long lives and remained in service until 1954. Many quality pre-war chassis were rebodied in the late 40’s and early 50’s but I do not know if these were. The Leylands spent some of the war years in Ireland with the Northern Ireland Transport Board

These Beadle bodies were popular with many BET group companies, most were built on refurbished pre war chassis, usually AEC or Leyland, and that was certainly the case with ten of NGT’s. However, from as early as 1923, NGT had a number of vehicles built on their own chassis. From 1951/3 a total of 43 vehicles were built on chassis classified as NGT/AEC, they were numbered 132/174, I’m not sure if NGT built the chassis from scratch or just refurbished them, but they had AEC running gear and A173 engines. 37 were bodied by Picktree to NGT designs, the service vehicles were affectionately know as ‘Kipper boxes’ In 1952, six of the chassis 143-48 were bodied by Beadle as FC35F, and allocated to Percy Main, they were FT 7275/80 – 175/80. Two more arrived in 1953, FT 7791/2 – 191/2, but I can’t find a chassis listing for them, so it is possible they may have been rebodies. They were FC39F and classed as D/P’s, the fronts were slightly different with less bright trim and a number section on the destination layout. At the time the first six were delivered the predominant colour for the coach fleet was red, but the livery later reverted to this familiar cream layout.

Too much reflection on the photo I’m afraid

To my mind, the Weymann Fanfare was one of the most handsome coach bodies ever built. Percy Main had six of these superb vehicles, they were C41F on AEC Reliance MU3RV chassis, FT 8997 – FT 9002 – 197/202; all delivered in 1955

Another four AEC Reliance 2MU3RV – EFT 550/53 – 250/53, with C41F Burlingham Seagull bodies, arrived on the scene in 1961, I know they’re not the classic Seagull of a decade earlier, but they still had an air of superiority about them, and personally, I liked them. They were eventually transferred to Northern and used as D/P’s

1963, was the year Percy Main’s last new ‘coaches’ arrived in the form of two C41F Plaxton Embassy II Bedford SB5’s HFT 264/5 – 264/5. I think Sunderland District also had some of these, but I am not aware of any others in the group.

Wakefields last throw of the dice came in 1968, with the arrival of four PSU3A/4R Leyland Leopard’s with C47F Alexander ‘Y’ bodies; EFT 703/4F – 303/4; and GFT 805/6G – 305/6. When not engaged on private hire or excursion work, they were frequently to be found working as duplicates on Northern express routes, okay, this one is carrying a days worth of road dirt, but its clear from its general appearance that it’s a long way from being scruffy or neglected, like all NGT group coaches they were always immaculately turned out and meticulously maintained

What I am about to say next, is my own personal opinion, and is based on my observations and experiences as a driver at Percy Main from 1967 to 1975.

Perhaps I am guilty of looking through rose tinted spectacles, we know BET and Tilling group companies were not perfect; and there is always room for improvement, but their vehicles were always well cared for and maintained to a very high standard. Always fearful of the wrath of the area Traffic Commissioners, the public service they provided, was usually of an equally high calibre. Fast forward to 1973, the Wakefields name has completely disappeared, and the four Alexander ‘Y’ types are all that remains of the once glorious coach fleet. Express service, private hire and excursion work has been transferred to National Travel, and now that the lunatics are running the asylum, former Tilling and BET group companies no longer have control over their destiny. Bright trim and badges have become an unnecessary drain on recourses. NBC has a virtual monopoly, so Public Service and pride in the fleet have become outdated and unimportant value that are surplus to requirements. The new regimes accountants, to quote Oscar Wilde, “know the price of everything and the value of nothing” as a result vehicles look sad and uncared for, the disease of apathy complacency and neglect has become a pandemic, and the company initials of NBC have become an acronym for ‘NoBody Cares’. Look at 304’s sister, as well as a change of name and livery, the wheel embellishments, Leopard badge and other bits and pieces of trim are all missing, in all probability, if any of the seat cushions have been replaced the upholstery does not match the original. The former NGT group were not alone, and the general impression that NBC vehicles project is one of couldn’t care less. It makes me so sad when I look back to when these vehicles first came to Percy Main and proudly carried the Wakefields name.

This is as far as we can go, the arrival of the AN68 has still to come, but the curse of the MK I Leyland National is already upon us. Wholesale fleet changes are taking place, with some vehicles moving from one end of the Country to the other. Among others, vehicles from as far a field as East Kent and Maidstone and District were reallocated to the NGT group. The Tynemouth name survived until 1975, but then, along with all the other Northern group subsidiaries, it became a memory.

Ronnie Hoye

09/2013


01/10/13 – 06:30

A first class series of articles and brilliantly illustrated. Brought back many memories of trips to Geordie relatives in the 1950s and 1960s and of regularly working in the area as a rep in the late 1960s. The ubiquitous exhortation to “Shop at Binns”, the variety of colour schemes and the Orion bodied Guys all made an impression on my childhood mind and the photos helped bring them back to life.
The 1960s Burlingham Seagull photo reminded me of a comment I heard many years ago something like “the only thing Seagull about that thing are the “wings” on the front panel”. I thought that it was rather a handsome body though perhaps the front was a little overdone.

Phil Blinkhorn


01/10/13 – 08:34

Superb article, Ronnie, and an excellent array of photographs. Your assessment of NBC is spot on. (Personal view it may be but accurate it certainly is).
In part two you question whether the 1953 Guys were Aurora or Orion. All your photographs are of Orions. NO Aurora (genuine originals, nor the later front loaders) would have been half finished rattle traps.
As a Burlingham fan and lover of the original Seagull, I too have a soft spot for the Seagull 70. Question? You say they were MU3RV. Are you sure they weren’t 2MU3RV? That would have been more usual for that year. The 2MU3RV was introduced in 1959.

David Oldfield


02/10/13 – 08:54

The photo of the Marshall Camair bodied Panther reminds me of the 1968 Commercial Motor Show at which a Northern all red Camair was on display. Its rather “different” looks were the subject of much comment but the one I remember best was “which silly B****r specified those” as the speaker pointed to the random pattern of flowers (roses if I remember rightly) which adorned the ceiling. I never travelled on one in service so I don’t know if the show bus was a one off but the possible reaction of the north eastern miners, shipwrights and dockers, if the flowers were a standard feature, had obviously struck the man.

Phil Blinkhorn


02/10/13 – 10:03

Regarding the ‘roses on the ceiling’ I seem to recall that, at the same time, Sunderland District had a few saloons painted in what was described as a ‘psychedelic’ interior style, with assorted random blobs of paint scattered around in some sort of pattern.

David Todd


03/10/13 – 08:41

Indeed a great series of photos and some interesting research.
Some of the photos in the article appear to have been taken as the buses came out of the factory, as they don’t have “Shop at Binns” painted on them yet.

Paul Robson


04/10/13 – 06:23

You’re probably right, Paul. The memory may be playing tricks, but I seem to think that when the 1967&8 Alexander bodied Daimler Fleetlines arrived, they were fully painted, but the name fleet numbers and the ‘Shop at Binns’ logo Etc, weren’t put on until after they had their PDI inspection.

Ronnie Hoye


09/10/13 – 12:11

Thanks Ronnie for your 3 part History fo Tynemouth and District Transport Company and Wakefields Motors. I travelled to school for 7 years on many of these old well-kept favourites along the Coast Road and the Alexander bodied Fleetlines were all time favourites although I did have a soft spot for 280 and 240! I can still remember nearly all the fleetnumbers and registrations and used to visit Percy Main to see if any new additions had arrived. Sadly a big part of my life back in the day…

Tom Carr


10/10/13 – 15:19

Sorry, David, I’ve just caught up with your comments. You’re right, the Seagulls were 2MU3RV’s. Oy blum moy luck uve tripeing sculls, either that, or I just plain got it wrong.

Ronnie Hoye

Copy changed


10/10/13 – 17:47

Ronnie, you should never admit the lack of typing skills.
Always blame your Chinese secretary – Ty Po!

Anon


15/10/13 – 08:39

Did Wakefields’ have separate Cap/Uniform badges like Tynemouth, Tyneside, SDO, and Northern?

Stephen Howarth


15/10/13 – 11:30

The answer to your question, Stephen, is yes, but only sometimes. All the NGT group uniforms were the same, they were a double-breasted military style with epaulets and had BET buttons, however, from memory, I think the colour of the piping and embroidered name on the collars was different. Northern and Tynemouth were red, SDO were blue and Tyneside green, I can’t remember what Gateshead was. On stage carriage work, all Percy Main crews wore Tynemouth uniforms, however, until about the mid 60’s, those drivers who had become regulars on the coach roster were issued with a second similar uniform in a dark maroon colour, to be used only when they were on coach work. I seem to remember that the piping and Wakefields name were in gold. All the uniforms were restyled ‘cheaper’ in the mid sixties, they became single breasted with no epaulets and plain buttons, and Wakefields uniforms were discontinued. Indecently, drivers and conductors had different overcoats; they both had a white half band about 4 or 5 inches up one of the sleeves, but drivers were on the right arm, and a conductor on the left. I was told that this was a throwback to the days before buses had indicators and hand signals were used, the reason a conductor had the band on the left was that at certain junctions they were expected to stand on the platform and give a left turn signal.

Ronnie Hoye


17/10/13 – 06:52

Thanks Ronnie for the full and comprehensive information on Wakefield’s uniforms. I take it from that they never had a Cap Badge, but insignia embroidered on to the collar of the tunic.

Stephen Howarth


22/10/13 – 09:59

I seem to remember a ‘ghost sign’ on a rather dilapidated garage on Albion Road North Shields opposite Christ Church which read ‘Wakefields Motors’ and I always wondered if that was an early depot before sharing the Tynemouth depot at Percy Main. The sign was written in feint white paint! I think I remember rightly…

Tom Carr


23/10/13 – 15:44

You’re quite correct, Tom, Wakefields depot was in North Shields. The entrance was in Church Way, which is just off Albion Road. I assume it became vacant in 1933 when the vehicles were moved to Percy Main.

Ronnie Hoye


24/10/13 – 11:55

Thanks for that and your excellent history of the bus companies from the perspective of a former driver. As a passenger I must have travelled thousands of miles on Service 11 later the 306 and have many fond memories of 236 breaking down outside of the Wills Factory.

Tom Carr


31/10/13 – 17:34

A terrific article. The distinctive livery of the buses gave Tynemouth a bit of identity, unlike today when the county borough has long been swallowed up by North Tyneside.
Having lived in the North Shields area all my life, I must have travelled many miles on Tynemouth and Wakefields buses, and for a short time in 1970 or 1971 I was one of a number of students employed as conductors during the summer holidays. My favourite route as a conductor was the long journey between Blyth and Sunderland which, at that time, had only been running for a few years since the opening of the Tyne Tunnel in 1967.

Bobjs


12/05/18 – 06:22

Ronnie.
With reference to Black Spot you refer to in part one of your excellent coverage BS can be seen listed on old survey maps as a BOUNDARY STONE.

Alan Coulson


16/05/18 – 06:11

I have never worked for either BET or THC -only for National Bus and family owned independents – and I know who I would prefer to work for. However I would offer the following (no less nor no more biased than those of other contributors) observations –
1) Presumably BET sold out to the NBC because they were embarrassed by the enormous profits they were making (or more realistically were going to make in the future).
2) The numbers of passengers and potential profit in the industry would enable companies to operate half cab vehicles with 2 man crews under pre-war terms and conditions of employment and wasteful use of resources indefinitely.
I know that this is a nostalgia site, but for those of us working in the industry at the time (and thinking about it) were uncomfortably aware that with or without NBC things were never going to be the same again. Return on capital employed was never going to look good again.
The political and economic policies around NBC rather than NBC itself was the cause. Never forget that the people operating the NBC subsidiaries were exactly the same people as were running the subsidiaries of THC and BET before them, so therefore the fault lies with the remit given to them rather than the staff involved – hence in a word politics. Exactly the same reason for the even worse failure that followed – deregulation and privatisation.
So please stop slagging off (by implication) we ex-employees of NBC who tried their best to implement policies for which we were not the authors, and give the best service to the customers with the tools and methods we were given

Malcolm Hirst


18/05/18 – 06:57

The seminal tome “National Bus Company 1968-1989” (John A Birks et al) records that BET did not sell out willingly at all. They did so because they were under twin threats. One threat came from Barbara Castle, who wanted to get her hands on their interests to develop her transport policies, and so overplayed the potential danger to their profits from the compulsory purchase powers of the new Passenger Transport Authorities. The other threat came from the trade unions, who had said they would not rest until the BET subsidiaries were under public ownership.

Peter Williamson


19/05/18 – 07:12

Does the book say how much the government paid to purchase BET and how the Labour government raised the money to do so? In the post-war nationalisation frenzy period, it usually issued what were than called Gilt Edged Securities, such as 4.5% Transport Stock 1965-1969. The public would then buy the stock, which would vary in price according to the variation in interest rates generally, but would be paid at the issue price during the five year redemption period. I recall there was one disgraceful one issued to fund World War One and which had no redemption date and so never reached to issue price. In the end, the government of the day promised to repay it to holders if they had or when when they reached retirement age! But I digress!

Chris Hebbron


23/05/18 – 06:52

Chris, £35,000,000 seems to ring a bell. Did Barbara Castle twist BET’s arm to sell, by threatening them with compulsory nationalisation or the effects of the CTAs on the profits from their most profitable operations? or had BET realised just how increasingly hard they were having to sweat their assets to generate worthwhile profits from their bus business, when they wee making much better returns from laundries/TV/etc? I suspect Barbara Castle threatened BET, BET put up a bit of a “free-market” fight, but that at that end of the day a willing buyer payed a bit more than first offered to what was really a willing seller.

Philip Rushworth

Northern General Transport Percy Main Depot – Part Two

Not read Part One click here

The layout of the lights on this Weymann bodied AEC Regent suggests that it could be from 1940, but the registration indicates post war. Percy Main had six, FT 5222/7 – 112/7, and they set the trend for many of the post war vehicles.

This 1946, Guy Arab was one of five with Northern Counties bodies, FT 5623/7 123/7; to my mind they were not dissimilar to the Weymann’s

1947; fifteen Weymann bodied AEC Regent IIs, arrived, FT 5698/712 – 128/42: followed by another fourteen in 1948; FT 6143/56 – 143/56

153 from the 1948 intake, with 157 from 1949 behind it.

The Northern Coachbuilders H30/26R Regent III’s were the last new AEC double deckers delivered to Percy Main, they arrived in 1949, eight in total, they were FT 6557/64 – 157/164. 157/8 were Wakefields.

1949, and 10 new Pickering bodied Guy Arab III’s arrived, FT 6565/74 – 165/74. Since 1945, the preferred choice of vehicle for P/M had been AEC, so they were out of step with NGT who had mainly bought Guy’s, these invariably had Gardner 5LW engines, so presumably 5LW’s were unavailable, as these Guy’s came with Meadows engines. However, they were unreliable and were eventually replaced with AEC units, although one ‘169?’ did received a 5LW.

FT 7381/90 – 181/90: These superbly finished H30/26R Weymann bodied Guy Arab III’s with Gardner 5LW engines appeared on the scene in 1952. They were the first 8ft wide buses, and the first with sliding cab doors. 189 was retained as a training vehicle, and was incidentally the bus I passed my test in. Livery c1961

When I started as a driver at Percy Main in January 1967, these 1953 Guy Arab IV’s were the oldest vehicles still in service. I am not sure if the H33/28R Weymann bodies are Aurora or Orion, but T&D had four, FT 7893/6 – 193/6; with Guy’s superb engineering and NGT’s favourite Gardner 5LW, they were reliable and mechanically sound, but they were about a ton and a half lighter than the previous Arab’s, and too many corners had been cut to save weight. The bodies were poorly finished and required constant maintenance, otherwise they would have literally rattled themselves apart.

FT 9003/7 – 203/7, arrived in 1955, and were defiantly MCW – H35/28R Orion; they were an improvement on the previous four, but none of them were ever the most popular vehicles in the fleet

Tynemouth had eight of these 1956 Park Royal bodied Guy Arab IV’s FT9408/15 – 208/15. At that time, the Arab IV chassis was arguably superior to anything else available to BET. The bodies were well designed, and superbly well built. They were nearly eleven years old when I first drove one, but they were extremely well behaved, very forgiving and very popular with passengers and crew alike; As you can probably gather, I liked them. In my opinion, had they had a Gardner 6LW instead of the 5LW, they would have been the best half cabs the NGT group ever had, I include the Routemasters in that statement. Livery c1961

Three Willowbrook bodied AEC Reliance MU3RV’s arrived in 1957. FT 9916/18 – 216/18; when new, they were DP/41F and never carried adverts, but they were later downgraded and re-seated as buses with a larger capacity, they were eventually transferred to Northern and renumbered 2240/2

AFT 50 – 220, was one of five H35/28R Willowbrook bodied Leyland PD2/12’s that came in 1957. They were AFT 49/53 – 219/223, as far as I am aware, they were the only vehicles in the group with this type of body; 223 had an extended life as a driver training vehicle.

Its fair to say that the Orion would not be everyone’s first choice for favourite body, and the least said about the early versions the better. However, by 1958, lessons had been learned and the Orion was now a vastly superior body to those built for the earlier Arab IV’s. As far as I am aware, these Leyland PD 3/4’s were the NGT groups first 30ft D/D’s, and they had quite a number of them. SDO specified Burlingham R/D bodies, but the rest of the group had the H41/32R – MCW Orion. In this photo 229 looks as if it has just arrived from MCW, and the paint has barely had time to dry. It was one of twelve delivered to Percy Main; AFT 224/35 – 224/35, Tyneside had three, NNL 48/50 – 48/50; and the batch for Gateshead had a Newcastle Corporation style destination layout, but that and different livery apart, outwardly, all the Orion’s looked to be pretty much the same, the interiors were finished in brown with leatherette covered seats, but the T&D vehicles had a much higher interior spec, as well as being a different colour, ‘green’ they had moquette-upholstered seats. As was Percy Main’s custom at the time, the front number plates were moved from the radiator to the panel under the windscreen. AFT 930, had an extended life as a driver training vehicle. It’s now in the extremely capable hands of N.E.B.P.T. Ltd, where ‘to date’ it is undergoing extensive restoration. If restored to its original livery, I have no doubt that the finished article will look every bit as good as this one does.

Still in 1958, six all Leyland Titan PD2’s – BTY 168/9 – 28/9 and CTY 330/33 – 30/33 were transferred from Tyneside; they were repainted in T&D livery but retained their Tyneside fleet numbers. Some were later transferred to Northern. Livery c1958

Numerically, CFT 637 – 237, was Percy Mains second PDR1/1 Leyland Atlantean, but Tynemouth’s first, 236 carried the Wakefields name. It was one of fourteen delivered in 1960, and they signalled the start of a new chapter, they were all H44/34F, the first batch of nine CFT 636/44 – 236/44, were MCW bodied, they were followed by five with Roe bodies, DFT 245/9 – 245/9. Eight more with Roe bodies came in 1962, FFT754/61 – 254/61. 241. After the 1962 batch arrived, it would be another 10 years before another Atlantean joined the fleet at Percy Main. The photo was taken after the formation of T&W – PTE, note the logo on the Newcastle bus, it was also after all the route numbers had been changed, this route was previously the service 5.

Along with the 1962, Roe bodied Atlantean’s, were two PSU3/3R Leyland Leopard’s with Willowbrook DP47/F bodies. FFT 812/3 – 262/3. Livery c1966. The original livery had the cream centre band relief, but the window surrounds were red. Incidentally, the location for the photo is Northumberland Square in North Shields, the building in the background is built on what was the site of the T&D tram sheds in Suez Street.

1963, while the rest of the group were ordering Leyland PDR1/1’s, Percy Main went down a different road and ordered Fleetlines, and not for the first time they found themselves out of step with the rest of NGT. Between 1963 and 68, they took delivery of thirty-five CRG6LX Daimler Fleetlines. The first fifteen were HFT 366/75 – 266/75 H44/35F – 1963; and JFT 276/80 – 276/80 H43/32F – 1964; both batches were bodied by Weymann. After the formation of NBC, several Tynemouth Fleetlines transferred to East Yorkshire.

Two Marshall bodied B53F Leyland Leopard PSU3/1R’s were also part of the 1964 intake – JFT 281/2 – 281/2; they were later transferred to Northern and renumbered 2351/2

The first Alexander bodied Fleetlines were delivered in 1965. They were all H44/33F, one batch had air operated doors and windscreen wipers, whilst the remainder were electric, but apart from that they were all more or less the same spec. AFT 783/9C – 283/289 – 1965; In 1966, Percy Main was the first depot to adopt a modernised and much simplified version of the original NGT livery, other depots later followed suit. DFT 290/2E – 290/2 – were delivered in 1967; and EFT 693/702F – 293/302 – 1968. The 1968 intake were the last D/D’s bought by T&D before becoming part of NBC

We have come to a time of significant change within the NGT group. The start of NBC coincided with the end of the County Borough of Tynemouth; it was also a period of rapid changeover to OPO. In 1968, six 1961, AEC 2MU3RV Reliance’s with Alexander DP41F bodies MCN 988/93 – 1888/93, were ‘hired’ from Northern. When they were officially transferred in 1969, they were renamed and became 310/15.

1969 and 3 new Marshall Camair B48D bodied PSUR1A1R Leyland Panther’s, HCN 43/5G – 307/9, arrived, but many vehicles were swapped between depots. Vehicles transferred to Percy Main were renamed and given T&D fleet numbers.

Two Panthers from SDO, EPT 371/2G – 371/2 became 320/1, their transfer involved a full repaint. Eight Northern B44D Alexander SRG6LX Daimler Fleetlines – KCN 22/29J, became 322/9.

The last new vehicles with the Tynemouth name and fleet numbers were delivered in 1970; KFT 916/9J – 316/9 were Bristol RELL6G’s with ECW B44D bodies.

In 1921, the first buses to carry the Tynemouth name and fleet numbers were not new; they were transferred from Northern, and with a certain degree of irony the last buses to be issued with Tynemouth fleet numbers were also transfers. These 1966 AEC Renown’s came from East Yorkshire; they arrived in 1972 and were numbered 330/9; the Tynemouth name survived for another couple of years, but all subsequent vehicles had Northern fleet numbers

Ronnie Hoye

09/2013

 

To view Part Three click here.

Northern General Transport Percy Main Depot – Part One

The story of The Northern General Transport Company Ltd starts in 1913, but the history of some of its subsidiaries goes back even further. Two of them were Tynemouth and District Transport Co and Wakefields Motors Limited; this is a brief and by no means complete history of those two. It would take far too long to detail every type of vehicle ever used, and some Information about pre war vehicles, such as exact numbers, registrations and fleet numbers has in many cases proved impossible to obtain. I do not claim that the article is 100% accurate, and I apologise in advance for any errors, but please feel free to correct any inaccuracies. The Wakefields name ceased to be used in 1970, by which time they were both Companies were part of the National Bus Company, the Tynemouth name survived until 1975. Northern’s original livery was BET red and white, but around 1931 this changed to red and cream. Pre NBC, the colours remained the same, and the pre war layout altered very little, but post war the black wings and mudguards became red, the lineout was discontinued and the fleet names became smaller, the amount of cream also diminished as you got towards the mid 60’s, with many of the single deck, and a very small number of D/D vehicles all red, however, in 1966, Percy Main reverted to a simplified and modernised version of the original layout. Where possible, I have shown vehicles in their original livery, but in some cases, the only photos I have they are in what was the current version of the period.

Percy Main depot is located in what was until the early 70’s the County Borough of Tynemouth; the majority of vehicles that came to the depot new were registered in the Borough and carried FT registrations. At its peak, the combined Tynemouth & Wakefields fleets numbered 105 vehicles, the majority of which were double deckers, but included in that number were 17 Coaches and dual-purpose vehicles. Between 1945/9 many pre war vehicles were rebodied, so some vehicles, or to be more precise, the chassis, crop up more than once. None of the rebodied vehicles were re-registered, however, many were redistributed to other depots throughout the NGT group and were renamed and numbered, the vehicles that returned to Percy Main retained their original fleet numbers.

The Tynemouth and District story has its origins in 1879, when work began on the construction of a 3ft gauge horse drawn tramway between North Shields and Tynemouth; it opened on 29th June 1880, but went bankrupt the following year. It reopened in 1882, as a 3ft 6″ steam hauled system, but that too was doomed to failure, lasting only until 1886. The track was extended and reopened in 1890, under the name of North Shields & Tynemouth District Tramways Company; the livery was crimson lake and cream. The company became part of the British Electric Traction Company ‘BET’ in 1899; the following year the line closed for extension and conversion to electricity. In March 1901, the modernised line that now ran between the North Shields New Quay ‘Cross Tyne Ferry Landing’ and The Victoria Hotel in Whitley Bay, reopened under the new name of Tynemouth & District Electric Traction Company Ltd; in 1904, the line was further extended to Whitley Bay Bandstand making a total distance of just under 5 miles. On the 4th September 1902, Tyneside Tramways and Tramroads Co; opened a line from North Shields to Wallsend/Newcastle Boundary, where it joined the Newcastle Corporation Tramways system, this allowed Tyneside trams to run into the City Centre and terminate at the Central Station. Tyneside became part of the BET Group in 1913, unfortunately joining the two systems was not possible because Tyneside ran on standard gauge track, and relaying the T&D lines would have been too costly. However, to provide North Shields with a partial overlap of the two systems, a third rail was laid along the half-mile section between Borough Road and Northumberland Square, thus allowing passengers to change easily from one route to the other. The last Tyneside tram ran on 6th April 1930, T&D tram services ceased the following year on 4th August 1931: In 1934, ‘Electric Traction’ was removed from the name, and the company became Tynemouth and District Transport Company Ltd: The name survived until 1975, when all NGT subsidiaries became Northern.

Information sourced from North Tyneside Libraries.

North Tyneside MBC

I have no idea of the significance of the black dot along the line of the A191. The map is c1990, and shows part of the South East corner of the Metropolitan Brough of North Tyneside. Much of the area shown is within what was the County Borough of Tynemouth. The route of the Tynemouth and District tramway is highlighted in black and the two squares along the route show where the tram sheds were, the one at the bottom was in Suez Street North Shields, and the other was John Street Cullercoats. When the line closed, John Street became the NGT group vehicle paint shop and body repair works, the location of Percy Main Garage is shown as a red square. At the time the tramway was completed in 1904, the area would have looked very different, most of the roads in red or orange would have existed, as did the railway, which was the N.E.R ‘later L.N.E.R’ North Tyne loop: Much of the area encircled by the loop was farmland; however, it contained dozens of collieries ‘none of which survive’ and several pit villages which have for the most part have become part the suburbs. Every pit in the area had its own railhead that linked it to the loop. A passenger service has always operated on the loop itself, but the primary function of the railway was transport coal to the Northumberland Dock at Howdon where it was loaded onto ships. The part of the network that survives is now part of the Tyne and Wear Metro system. The area south of the A193 was densely populated and highly industrialised, with thousands employed in the shipbuilding and repair yards located along the Tyne. The A1058 ‘New Coast Road’ was built in 1928; it ran from Newcastle to the junction of Billy Mill Avenue and Lynn Road, the blue square shows it’s full extent at that time. The Coast Road extension ‘Beach Road’ was completed in the 1960’s. The Tyne Tunnel, and the new roads linking it to Seaton Burn in the north and Birtley in the south opened in the 60’s, they became the A1 Newcastle bypass, and the existing A1 became the A167, but when the Newcastle Western bypass opened it was a case of ‘all change’ the Western bypass became the A1, and the previous bypass through, and to the north of the Tyne Tunnel became the A19, with the southern section becoming the A194.

J 2551, was Tynemouths first bus. A Daimler ‘B’ type new to Northern in 1914 as D1: it was originally a Brush bodied double decker, of the open top and open cab variety we are all familiar with from that era. It was one of five rebodied by Birch in 1919, and is seen here in that form, they were all transferred to Tynemouth when bus services commenced in 1921, on their arrival they became T1/5. Initially bus services were feeders for the tram network. Unfortunately, records and photos of pre war vehicles has been difficult to come by, however, my research suggests that; 1926, 6/11 were Brush BMMO bodied Tilling Stevens, in the same year, eleven BMMO 37’s arrived, they were numbered 12 and 14/23 ’13’ was not used, 1928 five BMMO SOS QL’s similar to the beautifully restored example at Beamish Museum. The bus network continued to expand rapidly, and in 1928, a more direct service to Newcastle became possible with the opening of the ‘New Coast Road’, which ran from Newcastle to Billy Mill, and considerably shortened the journey time to the coast: Licences to operate a service to Tynemouth along the new road were granted to Newcastle Corporation, ‘three vehicles’ Tynemouth and District ‘three vehicles’ and Wakefields Motors Ltd ‘two vehicles’. In addition, United and T&D were granted licences to operate a service to Whitley Bay and Blyth. Despite competition from United, NGT bought Wakefields from L.N.E.R in 1929, the purchase included six AEC and two Daimler vehicles, I do not have any details about them. In 1933, all Wakefields operations were placed under the control of T&D; and the vehicles were moved to Percy Main. However, Wakefields held some stage carriage, and a number of private hire, and excursion licences, so the name continued in use on some service vehicles and all Percy Main based coaches. Both companies ran in NGT livery, with fleet numbers in sequence.

The last tram ran in 1931, the tram depot in Suez Street North Shields closed, and the former tram sheds in Cullercoats became the NGT group paint shop and body repair works, where it remained until around the mid 50’s, when the work was moved to NGT central works at Bensham, and the Cullercoats site was sold for development.

These handsome H26/24R Short Brothers bodied AEC Regent 1’s, replaced the trams. There were sixteen in total, and I think they were FT 2516/23, 34/41 in 1931, and FT 2611/18, 42/49 in 1932, 42/5 carried the Wakefields name.

Northern Coachbuilders rebodied them in 1945 as seen here. Many of the newly rebodied vehicles were redistributed throughout the NGT group, but the vehicles that returned to Percy Main retained their original fleet number

These futuristic looking AEC Regent I’s with Short Brothers forward entrance bodies arrived on the scene in 1934; I do not have any information as to how many there were in total, but Percy Main, SDO and Northern all had them

At some point during the war, eleven of these vehicles were transferred to Northern, six Tynemouth and five from SDO, most were converted to diesel engines. All of the Short Bros bodies had an inherent structural weakness, some were so bad that special permission was granted to have them rebodied as utilities ‘as seen in this example from the Northern intake’ the rest were rebodied after the war. All the work was carried out by Northern Coachbuilders

Between 1935/6 Percy Main took delivery of eight of these legendary NGT/SE6 ‘Side engine 6 wheel’ vehicles, the one above was originally 82 in Tynemouth’s fleet. The first five were FT 3478.82 – 82/6, and had Short Bros B44F bodies, the three from 1936 were FT 3903/5 – 90/2 with NGT/Weymann bodies. When new they had Hercules WXC3, petrol engines, although most were later changed to AEC diesel. All eight were transferred to Northern in 1946. The original of the type. CN 6100, still survives, and is currently being restored by the N.E.B.P.T. Ltd

More forward entrance D/D vehicles joined the fleet in 1937; this time around Weymann built the bodies. The first three were AEC Regent I, FT 4220/2 – 93/5.

All the Weymann bodied forward entrance vehicles were rebodied in 1949. The Regent’s were done by Pickering.

In 1957, they had a third bite at the cherry, they headed to the south coast and joined Provincial as replacements for vehicles destroyed in garage fire, they remained in service with them until 1963

Eight more Weymann’s were delivered in 1938, FT 4596/4603 – 96/103, these were on Leyland TD5 chassis

The Leyland’s were also rebodied, despite the similar appearance the new bodies are Northern Coachbuilders not ECW

Ronnie Hoye
09/2013

 To view Part Two click here.


27/09/13 – 10:59

A very interesting article, and I look forward to the other parts.

However, I have a question: was there really a three-rail overlap between the Tyneside and Tynemouth tramway systems from Borough Road to Northumberland Square in North Shields? According to George Hearse’s “The Tramways of Northumberland” (1961) the three-rail section was a 30 yard stretch in Prudhoe Street west of its junction with Borough Road and Saville Street. This had been the western terminus of the Tynemouth horse and steam trams, and remained as a siding of the Tynemouth system (3’6″) when the newly-electrified route was built down the steep bank of Borough Road to the ferry landing in 1901. The Tyneside line (4’8.5″) was built the following year and used one rail of this siding to reach the east end of Prudhoe Street. This was the eastern terminus of Tyneside trams. As far as I know, Tyneside trams never ran east of that point (and similarly the subsequent Tyneside bus service terminated in North Shields near there by looping round Coach Lane, Stanley Street West and the top part of Borough Road).

Paul Robson


27/09/13 – 18:16

Paul, as I said, the information came from an article in North Tyneside Libraries, as we know, they are not always 100% accurate and at times have to be taken with a pinch of salt. I suspect that neither of us is old enough to remember trams in North Shields, and I was a bit sceptical as to why an overlap would go that far. However, I have seen photos of an overlap going as far as The Sir Colin Campbell in Saville Street, that would be about a hundred yards to the East of the junction of Borough Road, which would make far more sense.

Ronnie Hoye


28/09/13 – 07:18

Hearse is quite clear about where he thought the dual-gauge track was, but he might have been wrong. It would be interesting to see the photo of Saville Street.

Hearse’s book also has a photo of a Leyland Titan bus that replaced the Tyneside trams. The body is identical to the 1931 Short Bros. body on the AEC Regent in your article.

Paul Robson


28/09/13 – 11:34

Paul, I’ve dug out three photos taken from more or less the same spot.

in the first from Prudhoe St you can see the lines and overhead wires turn from Saville Street into Borough Road to go down to the New Quay.

In the second from Prudhoe St looking East they also come across the junction from Prudhoe Street.

The third Saville St looking West with a T&D tram turning into Saville
Street, no third rail in that shot either, but it does have the Tyneside tracks on the other side of the junction.

Ronnie Hoye


04/10/13 – 15:11

Re the connection between the Tynemouth and Tyneside systems, Charles Reed in his reminiscences of the Tynemouth tramways in Tramway Review Vol 4 No 29 (1961) writes:-

“I can well remember the [Tynemouth] trams terminating at . . . Prudhoe Street on a short length of track mixed-gauge, end to end with the trams of the Tyneside . . . company”.

I have an extensive collection of postcards showing Tynemouth trams in North Shields and have never seen evidence of the mixed gauge track continuing into Saville Street. For it to have done so would have been costly (involving crossing Tynemouth points) and would have meant cars of different gauges getting mixed up with and obstructing each other. It’s also hard to imagine what the purpose of it would have been.

But I had another question. For how long did the replacement buses carry the “via tram route” signs I have seen in photographs? I can’t remember them myself, but my late parents always spoke of the No 8 bus as ‘the tram route’.

Percy Trimmer


04/10/13 – 17:18

Sorry, Percy, I don’t have an answer to that. Has you probably know, the service 7 & 8 followed the old tram route from the New Quay to Whitley Bay Bandstand, at which point the 8 terminated and the 7 continued to Blyth. Several routes were known by nick names rather than numbers ‘some are not fit for publication’ but crews always referred to the 8 as ‘the Track’

Ronnie Hoye


04/10/13 – 17:30

Somehow, Ronnie, your Part I passed me by. Northern General has always fascinated me, especially the NGT/SE vehicles, a brief DIY effort.

I had a definite deja vu moment when I saw the Regent I/Short Bros photo, identical to the sole Portsmouth Corporation one, which never reached a parlous body state, having been written off by enemy action in 1941. Even the paint style was identical, save for the autovac! And the Regent/Weymann ones, so much like my Cheltenham District posting, although the CD ones had the traditional rear platform. Those Weymann bodies were very handsome, I must say.

Chris Hebbron


10/10/13 – 17:53

The People’s Collection on the Beamish website contains a view looking west from the Borough Road junction with double tram tracks leading into Prudhoe Street. It corresponds to two of the pics previously posted by Ronnie but looking in the opposite direction. Click on the thumbnails for bigger pictures although resolution is still low and hides much of the detail. http://collections.beamish.org.uk

The OS 1:2500 map for 1918 confirms a two track junction at this crossroads with the tracks in Prudhoe Street converging to form a reversing stub which is continuous with the Tyneside stub. It seems likely that the mixed gauge arrangement (George Hearse states 30 yards long) would lie at this mutual reversing location and that the Tyneside trams never went further east than here.

Notes from Tyneside T&T board meetings state:

13th September 1910 – “Negotiations with Tynemouth DET to lay a third rail along Prudhoe Street, North Shields, still in progress”.

12th June 1911 – “Laying of third rail in Prudhoe Street complete and cars running over same”.

Tony Fox


14/05/15 – 16:26

Regarding the 1938 Leyland TD5s, 96-103, according to the Northern subsidiaries Fleet History, these vehicles were rebodied by Eastern Coach Works in 1948. Tynemouth did have some AEC Regents with NCB bodies, but these had a different body style. I believe that the ECW look-alike style was introduced in 1950. Northern had, I believe a batch of Guys with NCB bodies of that style. I can recall these Leylands in the early fifties operating on service 5, however by 1958, when I started travelling to school on this route, they had gone and Guy Arabs 203-7 were the regular vehicles at that time.

John Gibson


15/05/15 – 06:33

John. I can assure you that 93/106 were not rebodied by ECW. Under the terms of the Transport act of 1947. Bristol chassis and/or ECW bodies were off limits to BET companies. The design is ECW derived, but the bodies were built by NCB.

Ronnie Hoye


15/05/15 – 17:50

Hi, Ronnie, thanks for your response. As you say, the 1947 Transport Act prohibited ECW and Bristol from supplying vehicles to non BTC companies, however, this only applied to new orders – they were allowed to complete orders that had already been placed, which took some time.

For confirmation that these bodies were by ECW, have a look at ECW 1946-1965 by M G Doggett and A A Townsin (Venture Publications 1993). On page 38, there is what looks to be an official photo of T100 (FT 4500) which clearly has an Eastern Coachworks sign placed in the destination box. There were actually thirteen of these bodies, eight for Tynemouth and five for Northern. Incidentally, Alan Townsin was originally from Newcastle, and so was probably familiar with these vehicles.

John Gibson


16/05/15 – 06:17

The black dot on the A191 appears to be in the area of the Wheatsheaf Inn, between New York and Backworth (spelling) colliery.

Perhaps those locations have some significance in the history of the company.

John Lomas


16/12/16 – 14:20

In the map at the start of the site you make mention of the ‘black dot’ which you have no idea what it meant. I am fairly sure, no, make that certain, that this is Northumberland Square which was the place in North Shields up to around the late 1960s where all bus services started from or passengers interchanged. Companies using them were Tynemouth, Hunters and United.

Newcastle Corporation buses service No11 and Tynemouth Service also No 11 ran a joint service but by-passed this by stopping on Albion Road to the north of the square on the way from Tynemouth Front Street to Newcastle Haymarket

I notice that there is a similar black dot further down the route in Whitley Bay and this was and still may be the smaller Bus Station.

I have not been there for a few years.

John King


16/12/16 – 16:52

I think the dot referred to originally is the round one out to the west, not either of the square ones.
The round dot is on the A191 and seems to relate to the Hypermarket north of the junction and the industrial estate south of it which appear on the ’85 -’95 OS. This is just to the west of New York the faint yellow loop of roads seen on the map just to the east.
www.old-maps.co.uk/ You may have to zoom out to see the map.

John Lomas


21/12/16 – 10:00

I have managed to get a Tynemouth and Wakefields fleet list, so hopefully I can correct any errors and fill in the gaps in my article. To the best of my knowledge, the article is correct for post war vehicles. Here is a link to view the fleet list. Tynemouth and Wakefields fleet list 1921 – 1944

Ronnie Hoye


28/12/16 – 06:45

Ronnie Hoye & John Lomas.

Reference the round dot, looking at the two maps and referring to the old map from John a B.S. is showing could this be Bus Stop it would not be Bus Station. I seem to recall a Farm House/Out buildings on the North Side of the road a gate is still visible in the fence however the farm buildings are long gone (fire damage) the B.S on the map is showing close to the gate hence bus stop near to Farm House. On the upgrading of road this stretch now has 2 stops on the North Side with the original one in the middle of the said present 2 stops. Having driven past Tuesday evening 27/12/16 the fields to the North retain boundaries as shown in old map with little to no change to green belt area. The B.S. on the old map may be a abbreviation as the public house to the right of map shows a P.H. under the listing of the Wheatsheaf at Murton so may be the B.S. is Bus Stop however I stand to be corrected.

Alan Coulson

The Tyneside Tramways and Tramroads Company Limited

I am extremely grateful to Tony Fox, and Bill Donald, for their help in putting this article together. The Tyneside name ceased to exist as an identity in 1975, inevitably, some records have been lost entirely, and in instances where I am aware of more than one account of events, I have pointed this out, nevertheless, I do not claim that the article is 100% accurate.

This is a relatively modern map, but it illustrates Tyneside’s tram routes to North Shields and Gosforth, it does not show the route into Newcastle City Centre. Some records say the terminus was Stanhope Street, whilst others say Central Station. I am not familiar with Newcastle’s tram network, but the two places are not that far apart, and travelling from Wallsend, Stanhope Street is beyond the Central Station, so possibly it went to one via the other. Tyneside’s depot ‘the black square at the end of the spur’ was situated in Neptune Road Wallsend; behind ‘Thermal Syndicate’ offices overlooking Swan Hunters Shipyard. In the 60’s, the factory was extended, and the buses were relocated to a new purpose built depot about half a mile east along Hadrian Road ‘shown as a red square’ what remained of the old depot became an ambulance station, apparently the tracks were not removed until 1975. Tyneside became part of the British Electric Traction Company in 1913; ideally, where the Tyneside and Tynemouth and District systems met, they would have been joined to form a through route from Newcastle to Whitley Bay. However, this proved to be a none starter as the track gauges were not compatible, Tyneside ran on 4ft 8½” standard gauge, Tynemouth none standard 3ft 6″ and the cost of conversion would have been enormous. However, where the two sets of tracks met, at the junction of Prudhoe Street and Saville Street, a short third rail overlap was created. Accounts differ as to which side of the junction the overlap was actually on, but I believe that it was unique in the British Isles. The last Tyneside tram ran on 6th April 1930: Bus services commenced with the two routes inherited from the trams, neither was numbered, but they were known locally as ‘The green bus’ the somewhat long-winded company name remained the same until 1965, when they became the Tyneside Omnibus Company Limited.

Tyneside Tramways and Tramroads Company Limited; played a smaller, but none the less significant role in the pre National Bus Company history of public transport in North Tyneside. The story begins on 4th September 1902, with the opening of a tram service from North Shields to the Wallsend/Newcastle Boundary; from that point onwards, they ran on Newcastle Corporation Tramways track. As far as I am aware, the revenue taken on that section of the route went to Newcastle Corporation, and Tyneside received payment for the mileage they covered. They also had a second route from Wallsend to Gosforth. Until the early 50’s the fleet numbers had a TT prefix, but never exceeding more than around twenty vehicles in total, to the best of my knowledge, Tyneside was the smallest of the Northern General Transport Group subsidiary companies. Their close neighbours Wakefields Motors Limited, had fewer service buses, but they also had coaches, so in altogether they had more vehicles than Tyneside.

The livery was dark leaf green and cream, and the buses were sage green and cream

After the First World War, Towns and Cities began to expand rapidly, consequently bus services were need to serve the needs of the ever- increasing populations. Tynemouth and District Electric Traction Company Limited began bus services in 1921; Tyneside Tramways and Tramroads Company Limited may have begun bus services at roughly the same time. However, according to the fleet records, Tyneside did not have any buses prior to 1930; but it is entirely possible they will have held stage carriage licences, which would explain the confusion. What is not in dispute is that Tynemouth and District operated a route from North Shields to Blyth via Whitley Bay. Accounts differ as to how this particular service came about. One version of events is that T&D successfully applied for licences to operate other routes in the North Shields and Wallsend areas. Meanwhile, Tilling Group rivals United, were expanding their stage carriage operations into South East Northumberland. BET regarded this as a threat, so to protect their ‘territory’ from further encroachment, T&D applied for a licence to run the service to Blyth, they were successful and the licence was granted. Another interpretation is that United objected and the application was refused. However, BET had anticipated an objection and had submitted a second application through Tyneside, and this proved to be successful. Nevertheless, I have been unable to find any documented evidence that Tyneside simultaneously ran tram and bus services alongside each other. If indeed they were granted the licence, it’s possible that T&D operated the service on Tyneside’s behalf. Obviously both cannot be right, and I am not prepared to speculate as to which of them is.

Tram Replacements

Six L27/24RO all Leyland TD1’s, arrived in 1930, TY 6970/75 initially numbered 31/36 but renumbered 1/6 in 1936. TY 7398 and 7913 numbered 7/8, followed them later the same year.

A rear view of what appears to be TY 7913

I have conflicting accounts as to what happened to these vehicles afterwards. Version 1, states that 1/4/7&8 were given H30/26R Northern Coachbuilders bodies in 1943 and by 1946, they had all been fitted with diesel engines. They were sold to Robson Bros of Haltwhistle in 1951, with 4 eventually becoming a Showman’s vehicle. Version 2 is that post war 1/4/7&8 were returned to Leyland to have the chassis overhauled and to be rebodied, and they came back as 28-31. Personally, I doubt this, my reasons being. In the 40’s & 50’s, many NGT group buses were rebodied, some which were originally from SDO & T&D were renumbered and allocated to different depots, but invariably they all retained their original registrations. Other records have 28/9&30 as a PD1 and 31 as a PD2 with new issue registrations. Wilts and Dorset bought 2/3/5; they were rebodied by ECW and fitted with Gardner 5LW engines, 6 was requisitioned by the Ministry of Transport in 1939 and went to Buckland of Perth.

Pictured at Hodgson’s on Benfield Road; the Leyland dealer for Newcastle, are three H27/24R all Leyland TD1 in Tyneside livery and numbered 9/11. New vehicles ordered by Tyneside had Northumberland registrations, but VK 3839/41 are Newcastle. They were delivered to Newcastle Corporation in January 1931, but were never numbered as part of their fleet. One explanation is that Newcastle wanted to retain an interest in the former tram route they had shared with Tyneside, but The County Borough of Tynemouth would not allow Newcastle Corporation vehicles within its boundaries. However, they had been operating on the Newcastle Tynemouth service 11, since 1928, this route was shared with Tynemouth and District and Wakefields, so I am not entirely convinced. Be that as it may, by the end of 1931, they moved to Wallsend, and remained with Tyneside until they were withdrawn from service in 1938, which seems a very short life for a Leyland. They were bought by Barton Transport, Chilwell, and rebodied by Duple as L55F.

It’s not clear if they came before or after the TS3A’s from Southdown, but between 1930 & 1931 Tyneside borrowed nine vehicles from Newcastle Corporation. Three CF6 Daimler demonstrators UB 1569 – VC 3882 and VR 5898. The Daimlers were later purchased by Lanarkshire Traction Company. The other six were English Electric H26/26R AEC Regents, VK 2378/9/70 May/June in 1930, then VK 2397/8/9 July 1930 to January 1931.

I don’t know if any more of the other Newcastle Corporation AEC’s which had been loaned to Tyneside were involved, but VK 2399 certainly got around. It had a spell on wartime service with London Transport, but was still in Newcastle livery.

Eight O27/24RO Tilling Stevens TS3A petrol electrics were bought from Southdown. One each from 1920 & 22, the rest were 1923. Registered in Brighton, they had a CD index but the numbers were not in sequence. They were allocated Tyneside fleet numbers 37/44.

43; CD 6834 – 1923

44; CD 6894 – 1922

42; CD 7703 – 1923

37; CD 7708 – 1923

38; CD 7711 – 1923

41; CD 8013 – 1923

43; CD 8282 – 1920

39; CD 8423 – 1923

Their Southdown fleet numbers were 201 – 94 -203/7/11/13, 82 & 223 respectively. 43 was originally numbered CD 5624, but was rebodied and reregistered in 1923 following a fire. They came to Tyneside from Southdown via Tilling Stevens in either 1930 or 1931 and had all been withdrawn by 1939.

12 – JR 773: an H27/24R all Leyland TD2 new in 1932, it was fitted with a diesel engine in 1946 and withdrawn in 1949. No further records found.

13 – JR 2393: an H27/25R all Leyland TD3c. In 1946, Burlingham rebodied it as H30/26R a diesel engine was fitted, on its return from Burlingham it was it reallocated to Gateshead. In 1956 it was sold to a building contractor in Hetton Le Hole, for use as a staff transport vehicle.

14/16 – JR 4049/51: H30/26R all Leyland TD4c new in 1935. Withdrawn in 1952, no further records found.

17 – TJ 4511: a 1933 H24/24F Weymann bodied Leyland TD3c demonstrator. It was bought by Tyneside in 1935, and rebodied by Northern Coachbuilders in 1944. It was withdrawn in 1952 and became a Showman’s vehicle. Presumably it was similar to the 1938 forward entrance Weymann bodied TD5’s of T&D, which can be found in my article about Percy Main.

A handsome 1938 Leyland TD5, its one of nine ordered by Tyneside. JR 8618/26 – 18/26. The body is an ECW design, but some records indicate that it was Leeds Coachbuilders Charles Roe who built them; they were the last buses to be delivered before WWII. They had long lives and were not withdrawn until 1954. Records suggest 18/22/3/4/5&6 went to Showmen, and 19/20&21 were sold to a dealer in London, but nothing further can be found. Its strange how many of Tyneside’s vehicles seemed to go to Showmen.

CN 5242: a 1931 Brush bodied AEC Regent; Apparently Tyneside’s only diesel engined AEC. It was new to Northern as 564; 1n 1932 it was transferred to Tynemouth where it became 50. It moved to Tyneside in 1941 and became No 27. Rebodied by Northern Coachbuilders in 1946, it returned to Northern as 1403.

Post War

BTY169

Tyneside’s first post war buses were three 1946, H30/26R all Leyland PD1 Titans BTY 168/70 – 28/30. 31/33 – CTY 331/333: 1948 H30/26R all Leyland PD2/1. Officially on long term loan, 28/30 & 31/33, were transferred to Tynemouth 1958. They were repainted in T&D livery but retained Tyneside fleet numbers. 34/37 – ENL 680/683 1951 H30/26R all Leyland PD2/3. 34&6 went to F Cowley of Salford.

BCN889

This PD2/3 was the last Tyneside bus to enter service before the arrival of the 1954 Orion bodied PD2/12’s. Its fleet number was 38; but, BCN 889 is a Gateshead registration. It was new in 1951, records say it was transferred from Gateshead the same year, but all Gateshead half cabs had a Newcastle Corporation style destination layout, and this one does not. Personally, I am inclined to think it may have been diverted to Tyneside before it left the Leyland factory, and never actually enter service with Gateshead. 35 – 37&8 were sold to Alexander (Greyhound) of Arbroath.

Here I go off on one of my rants again. Tyneside’s Newcastle terminus was in Croft Street; literally two minutes from the bottom of Northumberland Street, the main shopping thoroughfare in Newcastle. The building behind, is the old City Library in New Bridge Street. In the 70’s, several of the Cities Councillors stood trial for corruption and subsequently became guests in one of Her Majesty’s Prisons. Unfortunately, it came too late to save this, and many more of the City Centres beautiful buildings. Like many other Cities, Newcastle had its heart ripped out and destroyed. A hideous modern monstrosity, which has since been demolished, replaced the Library; at the time, it was called ‘progress’ today it would be criminal damage.

GTY169

In 1954, Tyneside took delivery of nine H35/28R – MCW Orion bodied Leyland PD2/12’s GTY 169/77 39/47.

The other end of the route was Borough Road North Shields.

NNL48

Tyneside had three 1958 H41/32R MCW Orion bodied Leyland PD3/4’s – NNL 48/50 – 48/50; Although in Tyneside livery, they spent the first months of their lives on loan to Tynemouth and District. After withdrawal 48 and 50 became Northern Group training buses, a rather different fate awaited 49.

Late comers to the world of rear engine buses. Tyneside were nearly four years behind T&D with these PDR1/1 MKII Leyland Atlantean‘s; they were in fact the last D/D depot in the group to get them.

BTY151B

The first three BTY 151/3B – 51/3 arrived in 1964, they had H43/32F Weymann bodies, and rather suited the Tyneside livery. The style of lettering on the Shop at Binns logo would make this photo no earlier than 1966. This is not the last time we shall see this vehicle, so prepare yourselves for a shock.

Between 1965 & 67, Tyneside took delivery of six PDR1/1 MKII Atlanteans with the superb H43/32F Alexander body; ENL 354/5C 54/5 in 1965 – HJR 656/7D 56/7 in 1966 – KNL 58/9E 58/9 in 1967 and one more in 1968, NNL 60F – 60 which had an H44/33F version of the body. This was to be Tyneside’s last new D/D pre NBC. By the end of 1973, all Tyneside’s vehicles had been painted in a hideous livery.

The start of OPO operations in 1969, and Tyneside ventured into what for them had previously been unexplored territory, they took delivery of their first single deck buses.

Two B48D Marshall Camair bodied PSUR1A/1R Leyland Panthers – RJR 61/2G – 61/2, were the only single deck vehicles to carry the Tyneside name. Two Bristol RELL ECW B44D’s which were scheduled to arrive, and would have been 63/4, were diverted to Gateshead, 61/2 were transferred with them. Tyneside were allocated two former SDO Burlingham bodied PD3’s. YPT 289&292 which became 66/7, They were painted yellow rather than green.

ETY92L

Strictly speaking, these 1973 Daimlers are too young for this site, but the chassis and body type ‘not necessarily in this combination’ had been around for a while, and they illustrate how fleets changed post NBC. Tyneside had five H45/27D – ECW bodied CRL6 Daimler Fleetlines, ETY 90/94L, they were the only Tyneside buses in the short-lived NBC green layout, before they became T&W yellow, and were the last to carry the Tyneside name. The fleet numbers had gone haywire; they were 90/94L. 92L is seen here on loan to Gateshead.

Life after Tyneside

After withdrawal from service, all 1954 intake had extended lives, 39 was bought by Samuel Ledgard, 40 went to Wells of Hatfield. 41/2/5&6 became Northern Group training buses, and 43/4 went to Patton Bros of Renfrew. By the time this photo was taken, 45 was at least 14 years old, it’s still in Tyneside green, the name has been changed but other than that it’s in more or less in the same condition as it was the last time it carried passengers.

GTY175

47, had a different ending. It went to the central engineering department at Bensham, where it was converted into a mobile workshop come towing vehicle, after that it became a ‘tree lopper’ it was still around as late as 1980

A very high proportion of Tyneside’s vehicles saw further service with other companies, and a surprising number went to Fairground Showmen. Inevitably, others went straight for scrap, but of all Tyneside’s buses, it was 49, which was to have the most unusual ending. Around 1969, it was involved in a serious accident, and at one stage it was being cannibalised for spares, however, the development team at NGT decided to see if a cost effective conversion could be found of front engine vehicles for OPO operations. This was the result, one of the Routemasters was given a slightly less radical treatment, they were named Tynesider and Wearsider. They were a brave attempt, but a failure. For a while, this one was based at Percy Main, but only used for staff transport.

New Tyneside vehicles were NL – JR or TY Northumberland County registrations, this one was reregistered after its rebuild. Ironically, it has survived into preservation. To date it is located somewhere in the Liverpool area.

Finally

BTY151B

All BET and Tilling Group companies suffered when the National Bus Company was created, and my views on the subject are no secret; even small depots like Tyneside were not immune from the disease of apathy and neglect. As well as the introduction of an atrocious corporate livery, they lost their identity and fleet numbers, and the vehicles looked neglected. BTY 151B is typical; Wheel trims gone, no shine and the paintwork looking like a patchwork quilt, hard to believe this is the same well cared for vehicle we saw earlier looking resplendent in sage green and cream. The destination suggests the vehicle was now part of the Gateshead fleet.

Following the creation of NBC, the name, livery and fleet numbers were changed, but the depot was still on the go, and both the routes were still in operation, but the newly formed T&W PTE had other ideas. The Corporation fleets of Newcastle, South Shields and Sunderland came together as a single unit, in a common livery; the PTE took administrative control of all routes wholly within Tyne and Wear boundaries, and decided that no two routes within the area would have the same number. Virtually everything changed; Newcastle Corporation’s route numbers started at 1, and with a few exceptions remained more or less the same. The numbers radiated out from Newcastle and some went up into the 800’s. The Newcastle North Shields route became the 313, and the route to Gosforth discontinued. Many routes were abandoned and other services rerouted to cover areas which otherwise would be without a service. The remains of Tyneside’s fleet was transferred to Gateshead in 1975, and replaced by vehicles brought in from various sources, none of them ever carried the Tyneside name whilst in service, but I believe one has been preserved in Tyneside livery. Eventually the 313 became another abandoned route, and the double deck fleet was reallocated to other depots. The PTE started several minibus routes in the Wallsend area, and the vehicles were garaged at Hadrian Road. However, none of the routes survived deregulation and the depot in now home to a Car and van hire company.

RIP Tyneside 1902 – 1975.

Ronnie Hoye

11/2013


08/11/13 – 17:13

The trams were numbered 1 to 30, so it looks as if the buses were, at first, numbered to follow-on from the trams.

In “The Tramways of Northumberland” George Hearse makes no mention of Tyneside Tramways and Tramroads bus operations before the abandonment of the trams though he does mention Tynemouth and District bus operations in the 1920s. That has always led me to think that TTT did not have a bus operation in the 1920s.

I think that George Hearse had access to the archives of Northern General Transport, TTT and T+D; he was also probably alive in the 1920s. So my guess is that he would have mentioned TTT buses if there had been any in the 1920s. He also said that the Newcastle terminus was Stanhope Street.

Paul Robson


09/11/13 – 06:05

Interesting article, Ronnie & Co.

The eight ex-Southdown Tilling-Stevens TS3A’s were almost certainly purchased to replace the trams scrapped in 1930. These ‘gearless’ buses would have made a useful interim vehicle for the tram drivers. More about these vehicles is at this link. It’s such a shame that none of them was preserved – It’s likely that they were the last in public service.

Chris Hebbron


09/11/13 – 06:07

Nice article Ronnie, with some lovely views of Tyneside vehicles – and aren’t the older style fleetnames huge? No disputing ownership of the vehicles there then. I well remember seeing Leyland Titan PD2 GTY 169 parked at the rear of Samuel Ledgard’s Otley depot still wearing Tyneside’s attractive green and cream livery. Some months later I saw it again following its overhaul and repaint into Sammie’s equally attractive blue and light grey. The Yorkshire firm presumably took a shine to GTY’s lightweight bodywork, as not long afterwards they acquired four similar-looking buses on AEC Regent V chassis from South Wales Transport. I have heard that the Titan could give quite a bouncy ride on rough road surfaces however, due to the combination of lightweight body and heavyweight chassis, but no doubt the Titan’s performance would have been quite sprightly as a result.

Brendan Smith


09/11/13 – 15:19

As you say, Brendan, the PD2 could be a bit lively. Percy Main depot used to borrow vehicles from Tyneside on a regular basis, I never drove one of their PD2’s, but I have driven all their PD3’s and the Weymann and Alexander bodied Atlanteans. We had some Willowbrook bodied PD2’s, and they tended to bounce a lot when empty or light loaded, but they were rather better at stopping than the PD3. It could be a rather interesting shift if you had one of Tyneside’s buses; Tyneside routes were not numbered, so people in Wallsend saw a ‘green bus’ and didn’t bother to look at the destination blind, they just assumed it was going to Newcastle, North Shields or Gosforth, so the traffic clerk had to make doubly sure they were allocated to a route that never went anywhere near Wallsend. As a rule they would usually be on one of the Coast Road routes, i.e. the 3 – 5 or 11

Ronnie Hoye


12/11/13 – 12:00

Many thanks Ronnie for the kind acknowledgement to myself and Tony Fox. I’ll just add some further information that lies within my own specialist interest, namely the electrical aspects of the tramway – an aspect that is largely overlooked in tramway history accounts.

It is not generally recognised that the Tyneside Tramways & Tramroads Company (TTT) was very closed associated with the Newcastle upon Tyne Electric Supply Company (NESCO), and the electrical engineering consultants Merz and McLellan (M&M).

Aside from shared directors of TTT and NESCO – the chairman of NESCO Dr. J.T. Merz was a founder and director of TTT, M&M pitched in with senior partner William McLellan serving throughout the tramway’s operation as their de-facto chief engineer. The tram shed at Neptune Bank, Wallsend was conveniently adjacent to NESCO’s Neptune Bank power station, and TTT shared land, amenities, office services among many other aspects of their business. Indeed it could be said the Tyneside Tramways were the public transport arm of NESCO.

One factor that helped TTT enormously was the availability and low cost of power. Like the North Eastern Railway (NER) a few years later, TTT didn’t have the capital cost burden of erecting their own power station – this was all provided by NESCO.

Power was supplied to TTT’s substation on the Neptune Bank site and this stepped down the 6KV three-phase AC from NESCO to 500 volts. This lower voltage AC was then fed to motor-generators sets which produced the 550 volt DC, suitable for the tramway. A motor-generator is essentially an AC motor mechanically coupled to a DC motor. When one of these motors serves as the prime mover, the other motor functions as a generator. Thus, AC in gives DC out and vice versa. In traction use the motor-generator was largely replaced by rotary converters, a single machine which does the same thing more efficiently and uses less space.

The output capacity of TTT’s Neptune Bank substation limited the length of the route to Gosforth. Although TTT had originally planned to reach the Coxlodge district, this was thwarted by Newcastle Corporation Tramways (NCT). So the Gosforth route terminated in Church Road, Gosforth from 1901 until 1904. TTT then considered Seaton Burn as their ultimate northern terminal.

Meanwhile NESCO had been busy extending its distribution network in the area and had commissioned a substation in Gosforth for the rapidly growing domestic, office and shop lighting demand. After installing a rotary converter set they were able to offer a 550 volt DC supply to TTT. This meant that the extension northwards to Seaton Burn could be implemented, no doubt to the dismay of NCT, who’s territorial ambitions were rather more than a match for TTT. However it would seem that the dream of Seaton Burn was to remain elusive as the tramway only reached the western gates of Gosforth Park in 1904. This was probably due to the voltage drop on the running wire which precluded getting any further.

Other reasons why this happened could have been lack of capital, overestimates of traffic levels arising within the Seaton Burn district, and availability of power supply – it was another four years before NESCO had extended its distribution into the south east Northumberland coalfield.

It is fair to say that after 1904, TTT stagnated in terms of potential expansion of its tram network. With the huge advantage of having a cosy deal for electricity from NESCO and no expensive power station to run, the original can-do spirit from the directors seems to have quickly evaporated.

By 1910 NESCO had reached the lucrative Ashington mining district of south east Northumberland with their state-of-the-art 20KV network, and with two substantial interconnected power stations at Carville and Dunston courtesy of the engineering brilliance of M&M, power supply was no impediment.
Indeed, had the NER listened to Charles Merz of M&M, the whole of the Blyth & Tyne section could have been electrified for both passenger and freight. I suppose this would have led the railway to wonder what to do with their legions of G5 and J27 locomotives – but that’s another story.

Bill Donald


13/11/13 – 08:41

Well done, Ronnie, with that comprehensive and well-illustrated history of Tyneside T & T.

A few comments:

1. Newcastle Corporation and Tyneside shared operations on three parts of the Tyneside Tramways network. Tramway A: from Wallsend High Street to the City/Wallsend Boundary on Shields Road. Tramway B: from Wallsend High Street to the City Boundary on Neptune Road (near Tyneside’s depot). Tramway C: northwards from Gosforth along the Great North Road to Gosforth Park.

2. Services operated by the Corporation over Tyneside’s tramways worked from Stanhope Street (and other destinations) to Wallsend High Street via Shields Road, from Westgate Road via Riverside to Wallsend High Street and from the Central Station to Gosforth Park. Corporation trams never operated east of Wallsend High Street, rather like the replacement bus services – Tyneside ran Newcastle Croft Street to North Shields throughout, but the Corporation service 13 only ran as far as Wallsend, taking in Walkerville on the way.

3. Does anyone know where the two Corporation tram services actually reversed in Wallsend? Possibilities are High Street West or Park Road, where trailing crossovers are shown on 1900-1930 maps. It would be nice to think that a ‘semi-circular’ service was at some time operated, i.e. into Wallsend via Shields Road then out again via Park Road, Buddle Street to the Riverside route (and vice versa), but no evidence of that has ever come to light.

A Tyneside tram reversing on Westgate Road, Newcastle, in 1912. (Photo from Flickr, copyright Newcastle Libraries)

4. Tyneside used Corporation tracks from August 1904 for a through service from North Shields to Stanhope Street in Newcastle via Wallsend, Shields Road, Grey’s Monument and Barrack Road. Corporation trams to Stanhope Street usually reversed in Brighton Grove but there is photographic evidence that Tyneside trams ran further, on to Westgate Road and reversed there.

5. From September 1925, Tyneside were able to use the Corporation’s Gosforth Park Light Railway to provide a recreational service from Wallsend and North Shields via the North Road to Gosforth Park, looping back over the Corporation’s West Moor route to reach their own network by a junction on Benton Road (called “Tyneside Crossing”, funnily enough!).

6. Tyneside’s original services had started in September 1902 (Wallsend to North Shields), October 1902 (Wallsend to Gosforth Church Road) and June 1904 (Gosforth to Gosforth Park, this being delayed by extensive railway-related works on the North Road, over the North Eastern Railway’s new Ponteland Branch).

7. After a great deal of wrangling, combined Tyneside/Corporation operations commenced in August 1904 (except for the Neptune Road link, delayed until November 1906 by the building of a new bridge under the NER’s Riverside Branch).

8. Relations between Newcastle Corporation and the Tyneside company had soured during 1901/2, when Tyneside twice had to change their plans for a tram terminus in Gosforth because of the Corporation’s successive extensions up Gosforth High Street. First choice had been the west end of The Grove (authorised but never built), then the west end of Church Road and finally in a side-street diversion via Rothwell Road, necessary to get to the North Road beyond the Corporation’s tracks at Henry Street.

A Tyneside tram on the mixed-gauge North Shields reversing stub in Prudhoe Street, North Shields, 1925. (Photo from Tomorrows-history)

9. Tyneside’s initial terminus in North Shields was at the Prudhoe Street/Spencer Street junction, a few feet west of the Tynemouth & District Company’s reversing loop opposite the Theatre Royal. By June 1911 the famous mixed gauge section was in operation, enabling Tyneside trams to run along the north side of the Tynemouth loop to reach the far end of Prudhoe Street. A very poor photograph, with a Tyneside tram at the extended terminus, JUST shows the third rail in place.

10. Leyland PD2/3 No. 38 (BCN 889) started life as a Northern General vehicle (part of the 1389-1393 batch), hence the registration number and the single aperture destination layout. It was new in March 1951 and transferred to Tyneside in June of that year.

Tony Fox


14/11/13 – 17:45

My impression is that the initial strategy of TT&T was to build tram lines in areas adjacent to the Newcastle Corporation network and then push for running rights into the city centre of Newcastle. As well as Wallsend and Gosforth, the initial plans included a line from Benton to Forest Hall and West Moor then through Gosforth Park. The main traffic would be into Newcastle, not to Wallsend or Gosforth. The through-running agreement of July 1904 came after TT&T had introduced a Bill in Parliament and after a public campaign by TT&T in favour of through-running. It isn’t surprising that relations were difficult between TT&T and Newcastle Corporation for some time after this.

My impression is also that the purpose of the Gosforth – Wallsend line was mainly to link up these areas with the base in Wallsend rather than as a traffic-spinning route in its own right.

Paul Robson


18/11/13 – 09:56

The caption indicates body of Leyland TD5 No 22 was possibly built by Roe, but it’s obviously an ECW design and the location of the photo looks like Nicholas Everitt Park in Oulton Broad where many ECW official photos were taken. It’s unlikely to have a body built in Leeds, drive it to Lowestoft for a photograph and return to Newcastle for delivery. Your thoughts???

Ray Stringer


18/11/13 – 13:41

As I said at the start, Ray, I do not claim that the article is 100% accurate, and I am merely pointing out that some records indicate that Roe built the bodies to an ECW design. As for the location, I am not familiar with the place you mention, so I can’t argue, however, there are no landmark buildings around, and I would have thought that one set of park railings look pretty much the same as any other, so the photo could have been taken quite literally anywhere.

Ronnie Hoye


18/11/13 – 14:30

…..but Geoff Lumb on page 53 of his book Charles H Roe makes reference to May 1940 when ECW couldn’t get materials for a batch of K5Gs for United Counties. Roe couldn’t source some TD7s for West Riding and an agreement was made for Roe to body the K5Gs with various ECW features – including six bay bodywork – to harmonise with the rest of the UCOC fleet.

It’s possible that these weren’t the only ECW/Roe hybrids.

David Oldfield


18/11/13 – 15:19

I’m surprised that someone on this forum hasn’t mentioned the fact that PD2/12, GTY 169 pictured above, found it’s way to Samuel Ledgard after service with Tyneside!

Chris Barker


19/11/13 – 05:45

In a book on ECW (2007) by Malcolm R White the same photo is on page 23 surrounded by three others at the same location and in this instance the picture is attributed to ECW as an official photo taken by their photographer. I live in Lowestoft and the location (Bridge Road, Oulton Broad) has hardly changed and this background has appeared in many of their photos. Another place used by the Coachworks for official photos was on the seafront at North Denes. Apparently they were always taken at the same time of day because the sun and light was agreeable to the photographer and the company. Shame Leyland closed them down.

Ray Stringer


19/11/13 – 16:18

Just to add my six penn’orth to the ECW-Roe discussion, in Duncan Roberts and John Senior’s book ‘Eastern Coach Works of Lowestoft – a retrospect’, mention is made of two senior members of C H Roe staff leaving Leeds for Lowestoft in 1936. William (Bill) Bramham was appointed General Manager of Eastern Counties’ Coach Factory just a few weeks prior to it becoming ECW, and Roe’s former Chief Estimator Ralph Sugden went with him. Mr Sugden was initially Assistant Stores Officer, but later became ECW’s Commercial Manager and Deputy General Manager. How much influence this had on ECW design at the time is not stated, but Mr Bramham had been with Roe since 1926, and Mr Sugden since 1924, so maybe this could explain some of the similarities between Roe and ECW products around this period. The book states that “Bramham is remembered as being a warm and considerate man, who made a point of walking around the whole factory one morning each week, and speaking to everyone”. (I remember being informed by several fitters some years ago that West Yorkshire’s Mr H.N.(Hector) Tuff did the very same thing each week at WY’s Central Works and Body Shop, whilst General Manager there. Sadly when he retired, that lovely gesture went with him).

Ray, I agree wholeheartedly that ECW should not have been allowed to close, especially given the
invaluable expertise of its staff and the excellent build quality of its coachwork. Even when Leyland was in charge, ECW maintained its reputation for good, sound products. If any proof was needed, one only has to consider the length of operational service given by the many ECW-bodied VRTs and Olympians operated in the UK.

Brendan Smith


19/11/13 – 17:58

…..and the same can also be said of Roe who went through a rough patch with early PRV metal frame bodies like the early Atlanteans. They came back to produce one of the best bodies ever (the PRV-Roe standard). However, at they end, the quality was acknowledged better than Park Royal. Indeed, SELNEC said that their best (built) Mancunians were the last (K reg) batch on 33’0″ Fleetlines. [This was strange as they should have been East Lancs bodies but, due to the fire, ELCB asked to be released from the contract. The contract was given to Park Royal (who had already built Mancunians) who had their own problems and sub-contracted them to Roe.]

David Oldfield

Rochdale Regent Vs

Lancashire in the fifties and sixties. All that variety! Well, that is perhaps what most enthusiasts will think, but as one who was there at the time, I can tell you that it was merely a variety of Leyland Titans. Of the 27 pre-1968 municipal bus fleets in Lancashire, all but one operated PD-series Titans, over half of the fleets being completely dominated by the model.

The one exception was Rochdale Corporation, whose post war double-deck intake consisted of 110 AEC’s and 52 Daimlers. Coincidentally, the AEC’s were equally divided between the Regent Mark III and Mark V models. This article is about the latter, which were definitely not typical examples of the Regent V.

More than half of the eventual total were contained in the first batch. 268 – 297 (NDK 968 – 997) were delivered in the spring of 1956. This was the largest single batch of buses ever bought by Rochdale Corporation; they were model D2RA6G, a variant unique to Rochdale. The 6G at the end denoted that they were fitted with Gardener 6LW engines, an option which was available for a short while in the mid-fifties. The engine wasn’t the only unusual feature, as this batch were also fitted with air operated preselector gearboxes of the type which had been fitted to the Regent III. This unit was by now nominally obscelete. Coincidentally, the only other operators of Gardener engined Regent V’s, Glasgow and Aberdeen, also used preselector gearboxes, although not the same unit.

The next batch, 298 – 307 (ODK 698-707) were delivered in December 1956. These were also type D2RA6G, but this batch had the semi-automatic gearbox (AEC called it “Monocontrol”) which had superseded the preselector gearbox on the Regent V model. Thus it can be seen that Rochdale Corporation was one of the first operators to specify semi-automatic gearboxes as a matter of policy, rather than experiment.

308 – 318 (RDK 408 – 418) were delivered in the autumn of 1957, and these introduced the D2RA model. This version had the AEC AV590 engine, coupled with the semi-automatic gearbox, although when new, 318 had a fully-automatic gearbox (automonocontrol.)

The final quartet came in the autumn of 1958. These were 319 – 322 (TDK 319 – 322) and were again model D2RA. These differed from the previous batch in having platform doors.

All of these 55 new vehicles had Weymann bodies (H33/28R or H33/28RD) of the elegant 4-bay design which was developed from the classic post-war Weymann design already familiar on the Regent III model. This design is sometimes referred to (incorrectly I believe) as the Aurora. The design was enhanced by Rochdale’s magnificent royal blue and cream “streamlined” livery, complete with a lack of external advertising.

Naturally the delivery of 55 new buses (about a third of the fleet) resulted in these buses taking over most of Rochdale’s busiest routes. The TDK batch, with their platform doors, were an obvious case of keeping up with the next-door neighbours. They took over Rochdale’s share of service 21 to Bury via Heywood, operating jointly with Bury Corporation’s Leyland Titan PD3’s which had doors! The ODK’s and RDK’s were used on the other long, out of town routes such as the 9 (Ashton-Under-Lyne) and 16 (Bacup). In particular, the RDK batch took over Rochdale’s share of the very busy joint service 17 to Manchester via Middleton. Surprisingly, these buses ruled the roost on the 17 for twelve years; apart from one peak hour working associated with the express service 8, 308 – 318 monopolised Rochdale’s four workings on this route day in and day out! As I lived in Middleton I saw these buses every day, they really summed up the Rochdale fleet for me!

The first change to affect the Regent V’s was the appearance of external advertising on Rochdale’s buses, and for a while it seemed that every Rochdale bus I saw was telling me that People love Players.

In 1961, 277 (NDK 977) was repainted in an experimental livery of cream with a single royal blue band at upper-deck floor level. A couple of other buses (of different types) were repainted in a similar scheme, but with a lighter shade of blue, and this scheme was initially adopted by the Corporation; new AEC Reliances 16-20 (3116 – 20 DK) were delivered in this scheme. However, it was soon decided to adopt the scheme worn by 277. Once this had been decided, the Regent V’s were, surprisingly, repainted in reverse numerical order, starting with 322 and working downwards.

In 1963, Rochdale’s first batch of Daimler Fleetlines (323 – 327: 6323-7 DK) were delivered. Not surprisingly they entered service on the 21, on which Bury Corporation was already using Leyland Atlanteans! This obviously displaced the TDK batch, which no longer had a natural home; one was used most days on Rochdale’s share of service 24 to Manchester via Chadderton, which was limited stop for part of its length. The others were often to be found on the Bacup route, and sometimes on the 19 to Bury via Jericho.

During the 1960’s Rochdale bought a number of small batches of buses. By another coincidence, these consisted of 22 single-deckers, used for one man operation, and 22 double-deckers. The latter were all Daimler Fleetlines, and they displaced the Regent V’s from some other busy routes.
At some point during the sixties, 307(ODK 707) had its Gardner engine replaced by a non-standard AEC engine which had, I believe, been removed from a withdrawn Regent III.

In 1969, Rochdale’s buses were taken over by Selnec PTE. The first noticeable change was to the fleet numbers. I was surprised to find that the PTE’s new system did not take account of the different types of bus, but rather their origin; all of the ex-Rochdale double-deckers had 5900 added to their fleet numbers, so that the Regents became 6168 – 6222. Eventually the Mark V’s were repainted in Selnec’s white and orange livery, 6204 – 6 and 6215 being among the first recipients.

The next change resulted from the renumbering of Selnec’s routes into a common series, at the beginning of 1973. Rochdale’s stage services were numbered in the series 440 – 471, with special services (schools, works and hospital) from 876 to 894. Since Rochdale’s buses had single-track service number blinds, new blinds were fitted to these buses. Unfortunately the new blinds were smaller than the Corporation blinds they replaced, and the glass screens were masked down along the top and one side, giving a very unfortunate appearance. At the same time, Selnec replaced the destination blinds with new blinds which again were smaller than the old blinds, and again a lop sided look was adopted.

In the period 1970 – 1972 I spent many a Saturday afternoon riding on Rochdale’s Regents and Reliances. As with several other Pennine towns, Rochdale had several routes which took on a fairly rural outlook towards their outer ends. I developed several favourites, in particular 6168,6184 and 6202, which had superb Gardner engine sounds, coupled with the melodic contralto voice of the epicyclic gearboxes. Rochdale’s Regent V’s did not have that two-tone whine so typical of Regent V’s with the usual manual gearbox.

The first withdrawals of the type were of 6194 and 6199 early in 1973. 6187 became a driver training vehicle at this time. Regent V’s continued to be taken out of service in ones and twos, but it wasn’t until 1975 that withdrawals started in earnest, by which time many of the fleet had served for nineteen years.
One day in early 1975, I was amazed to see one of Rochdale’s Regent V’s working from Oldham Depot. At least four examples, 6178, 6184,6204 and 6216 were transferred to Oldham as a stop gap measure. Two months later, “Buses” reported that the first two of these, together with 6206, were working from the former Manchester Corporation Depot at Hyde Road. However, these vehicles were soon withdrawn, along with many of their sisters in Rochdale. One example, 6181 ended its career in spectacular manner by hitting the low bridge near Rochdale Station.

In 1975 my employers suffered financial difficulty and this, to cut a long story short, resulted in me joining the staff of what was now Greater Manchester Transport’s Rochdale Depot as a conductor. By this time there were only twenty Regent V’s in service at Rochdale, and one of these, my old favourite 6168, was withdrawn during my first week, before I had a chance to work on it.
Rochdale did not have the usual system of some buses working all day, and others just in the peak hours. In Rochdale in the mid-seventies, buses which had stayed in service during the daytime off-peak returned to the depot after the evening peak, and buses which had worked the morning and afternoon peak hours stayed out in the evenings. This resulted in older buses (i.e. Regent V’s) working until late at night.

On Saturdays there were no peak hours in the same way. One particularly interesting result of this was on service 24 to Manchester via Chadderton; if one Fleetline had stayed on the service for the full nine round trips on Saturday, it would have run out of fuel. Accordingly, at 1800 hours this bus changed places with a Regent which had spent the day on the very short service 442 to Spotland. Thus, the 24 was operated by Fleetlines all week except for the last three trips on Saturday evening which were operated by a Regent V! Not surprisingly, most of the crews hated this arrangement, but I couldn’t wait for my turn!

By now the RDK batch had lost its monopoly of service 17 workings, and any type of bus could appear on the route. On Monday – Friday evenings, the 1730,1930 and 2130 departures from Rochdale were regularly operated by a Regent V. However the 1910 and 2110 journeys were normally worked by a Selnec/GMT standard Fleetline, and the other two Rochdale buses on the route were older Fleetlines. I never understood this, but it happened regularly during my time on the Rochdale buses.

While working on the buses is a dream come true for enthusiasts, it also had its frustrations; very often I would see Regents working the same duties day after day, but on the day I was on that duty it would often turn out to be a Fleetline!!
During my training period I conducted several Regents under supervision. Usually my instructor watched the platform while I collected the fares. On my first “solo” trip on a Regent V I was busy collecting fares when I suddenly realised that the bus was standing still; the driver was waiting at a stop for me to ring the bell! All of the Regent V’s had strip bells, which certainly made life easier for the conductor, and on a nice day what could be better than watching the world go by from the open platform!

In Rochdale, unlike some other locations, drivers and conductors were paired off together permanently, and my mate hated the “back loaders” with a passion, especially the “pedal buses”, ie the NDK batch with their preselector gearboxes. He would find any excuse to send a Regent into the garage with any minor defect, and on one or two occasions he lit a match and held it under a fuse, the result being a chance to ask for a changeover bus.

After five months I took the opportunity to change my mate, to work with a driver who was also an enthusiast. However, on the day I should have started to work with my new driver, I was called into the driving school. After a fortnight on en ex-Bolton PD2 (now in the Manchester museum of transport,) I passed the test. A few days later, as part of my “all types training”, I had a spell, with an instructor, on 6196. Naturally this was a thrill, after all the anticipation, I was finally driving a preselector Regent. We drove along the Bacup route, then, to my surprise, we continued over the moors to Burnley. The journey back, with my fellow trainee at the wheel, was an anti-climax!

There was a few weeks’ pause before I got a place on the drivers’ rota, and during this period it was permitted for the driver and conductor to exchange places. The first time I drove a Regent on service 17, I got stuck behind a very slow moving van towing another van. Every time I got in front, the vans would overtake me at the next bus stop. On arrival at Rochdale, seven minutes late, a stern-faced inspector told me I would have to do better when I went driving full time.

By the time I was driving, there were only 12 Regent V’s in service, including five of the NDK’s. The preselector gearbox was a fascinating feature, I couldn’t get enough. In the cab, the Regents sounded very different; the gearbox sound was inaudible, and you just had the sound of the engine; on the Gardner versions this was really music to my ears. There was one poor Regent V to me, 6180, which ironically is the sole member of the NDK batch to be preserved (as Rochdale 280). The problem was that when you took your foot off the accelerator, the engine continued to rev for a few seconds, which made it difficult to change gear without a jerk. On the other hand, 6172 was magnificent, light steering, perfect gearchange and a lively performance too.
I remember one late turn which started on the cross-town service 440 (Turf Hill – Syke.) On one occasion I had 6172 and thoroughly enjoyed myself. After the meal break, we had two trips to Manchester on service 24. The Fleetline on this service was faulty (honestly) and so I asked for a changeover for the 2200 departure. A fitter arrived from the garage with 6172, grinning from ear to ear at the thought of punishing me for requesting a changeover at that late hour. Needless to say I had a whale of a time on that final trip, although my conductor was not impressed!

Some drivers complained about heavy steering on the Regents, but this was certainly no worse than a fully loaded Fleetline. The survivors were gradually withdrawn, and all too soon 6198 was the last survivor; it was finally withdrawn in the spring of 1977, a mere 21 years old. Only three months later, I left Rochdale to take up my dream job, driving Crosville Bristols in North Wales.
Two examples of the breed survive in preservation, both restored to the original streamlined livery, despite having been in the mainly cream livery for most of their lives. Thus they can be seen again in their former glory, to remind us of the unique fleet of buses which served the town of Rochdale in years gone by.

Donald McKeown
12/2013

06/12/13 – 11:55

Donald’s very interesting piece raises memories and a number of comments. The first Regent Vs appeared on the #9 from Rochdale to Ashton a few short months before we moved from the bottom of Oldham Rd., Ashton to Stockport so I had little chance to ride on them when new. They looked very modern, imposing and extremely smart in Rochdale’s blue and cream.
The #9 had been well served by Rochdale’s Regent IIIs which were totally different in every visual and aural respect to the Oldham and Ashton Leylands and Crossleys which were the other regular offerings on the route, not to mention the Rochdale and Oldham Daimlers which were rarer performers and the Ashton Guys (some austerity in original form, some rebodied) which operated the short workings to Hathershaw. If there was a route in the North West to offer a variety beyond the Leyland PD dominance, this was it. Throw in the mix of body builders the chassis carried in 1956 – Leyland, Crossley, Weymann, Roe, MCW, East Lancs and Massey – and there was a good cross section of British bus manufacture on just one route.
AECs were not exactly rare with North West operators, just less common compared with the preponderance of Leylands – the purchase of which most Councils saw as supporting local industry. North Western (single deck), Mayne (double deck), Salford (double deck), Leigh (double deck), Bury (double deck), Chester (single deck), St Helens (single and double deck), Liverpool (double deck) and, of course, that other Rochdale operator, Yelloway.
Just what set Rochdale Council so firmly against Leyland post war I’ve never found out. Only 47 Leylands were ordered prewar and one was inherited from Yelloway with the Manchester route. Even prewar there was a preponderance of orders for Dennis and Crossley. Presumably most of the Regent Vs received Gardner engines for commonality with the Daimlers in the fleet and for the engine’s undoubted power and reliability. Just why they couldn’t persuade AEC to fit the engine to the last deliveries is an interesting question.
The Regent Vs gave great service and were distinctive enough (though less so with the spray painted livery) to be a significant part of the character of Rochdale for many years and help make the town different to its neighbours.

Phil Blinkhorn


06/12/13 – 11:56

Donald. Thanks for your fly on the wall experience of these beautiful vehicles but, two points of correction and clarification.
The D2RA (as well as all other AEC engined heavies) had the AEC A218 engine (carried over from the Regent III). The AV590 was a different, new, wet liner engine which was fitted after 1959 to the series 2 versions – ie 2D2RA, 2D3RA etc. [See Regent V, Stewart J Brown, Ian Allan).]
The body was correctly called the Aurora. [See The Weymann Story Part 2, John A Senior, Venture Publications.]

David Oldfield


06/12/13 – 11:57

Thank you Donald for a most fascinating article about one of the most glorious of the numerous captivating and colourful Lancashire municipal fleets. In what I promise will be only a brief digression from the Mark V I’ll just say that my only working contact with Rochdale buses was when Samuel Ledgard bought five Mark 3s with east Lancashire bodies, GDK 401 – 405 (201 – 205). I drove them all, four only occasionally as they were at Leeds depot, but at Otley our GDK 401 which I took with joy whenever I could get my hands on it – majestic, comfortable, and very lively in a dignified way, and in a nice little touch Ledgard’s had left the gold fleet numbers in both saloons.

Here is a picture of a very happy me with GDK 401 returning to Otley from one of the local estates, having just crossed the River Wharfe bridge – oh, to do the same again today !!

Chris Youhill


09/12/13 – 09:19

Many thanks to Donald for his account of the Rochdale Regent Vs, which were always my favourite way of getting into Manchester, as I lived just a couple of miles south of him until 1968. In terms of vehicle policy I think of Rochdale as an honorary Yorkshire operator, counterbalancing Todmorden which was an honorary Lancashire one!
Just a couple of small points. Firstly, although David is correct in saying that the A218 was the standard engine in the D2RA, information displayed with 322 at the South Yorkshire Transport Museum says it has an A208. Was there ever such an engine, or is this an error? Secondly, I’m less convinced than John Senior that this style of body was ever officially called Aurora. The odd thing is that by the time of the 1954 Commercial Motor Show there were quite a lot of them in service in various places, and yet MCW were still promoting the original 1952 Aurora, a completely different design of which only one was ever built.

Peter Williamson


09/12/13 – 11:49

The original 9.6 litre engine fitted to the Regent III was the A208. Apparently it was found that some so fitted were tending to overheat when driven hard due to coolant not reaching the rearmost cylinder, so an external pipe was fitted to feed coolant to the back of the cylinder head, and this variant became the A218, becoming standard from around 1949. (This information is from Alan Townsin’s ‘Best of British Buses – Postwar Regents’)
By the time the Rochdale Mk. V’s were built they would have been fitted with the A218, but it’s possible that an older engine may have been fitted to the preserved one at some point.
There was also an A204 variant for the London RT, an A213 which I think had a different means of attaching the cylinder head and used mainly in goods chassis, and the A219 was a horizontal version of the A218 for the Regal IV.

John Stringer


09/12/13 – 11:53

A slight amendment to my previous comment. The very original AEC 9.6 litre engine was actually the A185 ‘pot cavity’ unit as used in the prewar (okay, actually early wartime) LT RT.

John Stringer


10/12/13 – 06:41

I was once told by a non-enthusiast friend (who had lived in Heywood for most of his life) that Rochdale ‘couldn’t buy Leylands’. I took this to mean that there had been, at some stage, a terminal ‘falling-out’. Can anyone confirm or deny this?

David Call


10/12/13 – 12:15

Whilst I know of instances of operators falling out with suppliers and the odd instance of suppliers refusing to supply (normally bad credit risk) operators, I know of no instance of Leyland Motors refusing to supply a municipal operator so any refusal is almost certain to be Rochdale’s.

Phil Blinkhorn


11/12/13 – 06:35

It often happens that people hear things and repeat them out of context, so that a one-time problem can be portrayed as a permanent prohibition. Postwar Rochdale had, for double-deckers, a policy of buying vehicles with fluid transmission. Until I checked, I had assumed that, in common with many other operators, they did this to facilitate retraining of tram drivers, but since it appears that Rochdale’s tramway system ceased in 1932 that cannot be the case. However, whatever the reason, it is a fact, and it means that for a while, Rochdale “couldn’t buy Leylands”, because Leylands came with only manual gearboxes.
Another possible explanation is a difference of opinion between the management and the Transport Committee. This was certainly true the other way round in Manchester, where the management “couldn’t buy AECs” because the Transport Committee said so!

Peter Williamson


11/12/13 – 08:49

Like Peter W (comment 09/12/13 – 09:19), I was under the impression that the “Aurora” was a one off design. Devon General 679 (NTT 679) was an AEC Regent III built in 1952. According to the first edition of “British Bus Fleets 8” published in 1964, “This vehicle was exhibited at the 1952 commercial motor show and has a prototype body given the type name ‘Aurora’ which did not go into production.”

Don McKeown


11/12/13 – 14:48

I had thought of mentioning Stuart Pilcher’s desire to obtain AECs when I listed the North West AEC operators.
Whatever the reason for Rochdale’s choice it made the Rochdale townscape distinctly different.

Phil Blinkhorn


11/12/13 – 14:49

The Aurora name was revived in 1957 for a forward entrance version of the Orion-style body, appearing as such on brochures and in adverts – I have a 1959 copy depicting a Halifax JOC PD3 which is described as an Auraora – but this name seemed to fizzle out after a couple of years or so.
The naming of MCW Group double deck products appears to be rather confusing, and I’ve never quite followed it. I have seen references to Orion-style bodies that were not actually called Orions, but I think Mk. IV’s. Though the Orion was introduced in 1952 as a super lightweight body, not all of them were lightweights.
In my very first bus book – Ian Allan’s ‘ABC of Buses and Coaches’ (1956)- there is an MCW official photo of my local operator Halifax JOC’s Daimler CVG6 DCP 851. This is described as having a ‘more substantial’ version of the Orion body. The actual unladen weight of these was 7tons 2cwt 3qtrs, which I reckon was still quite light for a CVG6 with epicyclic gearbox (the contemporary Roe teak framed ones weighed 7.17.2). The super-lightweight Orion was popular at first, many of them weighing in at only 6 tons odd, but then it appears that operators realised they had taken weight saving a little too far, and by the late 1950’s most seemed to be of the more substantial type.
MCW do not seem to me to have used the Orion name as much (if at all) from then on and I wonder if the name was intended only for the original lightweight version, and the Mk.IV was the eventually more common heavier one. Halifax’s forward entrance PD2’s of 1960-66 weighed around 8 tons, their 1959 PD3’s were 8.9.0, the 1960 Regent V 30-footers were 8.7.0, and the 1963 PD3’s were 8.6.0, so they had put a lot of weight on by then.
It also leads me to wonder what Mk’s I, II & III had been, and since there went on to be four-bay versions and other variants whether there were other ‘Mk.’ numbers we don’t know about. Does anyone have MCW brochures from the late 1950’s and 1960’s where they still use the Orion name, or is it a case of enthusiasts perpetuating the name wrongly until they believe they are right – rather like happened with the Leyland Farington ?

John Stringer


12/12/13 – 07:10

There were always two versions of the Orion body structure. What changed over the years is that the lightweight version varied in just how lightweight it was. Manchester tried both original super-lightweight and heavy versions in 1955-6, and then settled on a beefed-up lightweight from 1958. Salford, starting in 1962, only ever bought heavies.
Returning to Rochdale Regent Vs, I see that 280 is currently being advertised for sale. I am very surprised at this, as I always assumed it was owned by the Greater Manchester Museum of Transport rather than an individual.

Peter Williamson


12/12/13 – 12:22

Whilst Salford bought “heavy” Orions, they also bought far more forward entrance Auroras – if that name is correct. Just what was it about the construction of these – which were basically Orion lookalikes, that necessitated the extra thick upper deck pillars around the window over the door?

Phil Blinkhorn


13/12/13 – 07:13

Salford’s forward entrance PD2s had an extra wide bay in the body structure to accommodate the doors. The upper deck window in this bay is standard width, and therefore requires extra thick pillars to make it fit.
Apologies for incorrect information about 280. It is in fact one of the ODKs that is for sale. Owing to a typo the number isn’t given, and I assumed it was 280 because I didn’t know any other Gardners had survived.

Peter Williamson


13/12/13 – 07:23

Just for clarification, as far as I know it’s only 305 that’s for sale, not 280. 305 has never been very active on the preservation scene and what is left of the paintwork is still orange.
Also this is my opportunity to thank Donald for an excellent article which not only covered a neglected fleet but dealt with aspects which in themselves are not well documented even for the better-known fleets.

David Beilby


13/12/13 – 16:51

To avoid digressing too much from the subject I’m going to post a new topic regarding the MCW Aurora – the forward entrance version on the Any Other Thing page.

Phil Blinkhorn


18/12/13 – 06:27

John Stringer made mention of Met-Cam bodies known as Mark IVs and wonders if there were any other mark numbers.
In 1958/9 Nottingham City Transport took delivery of 44 Leyland PD2/40s with MCCW bodies. The 1958 deliveries fleet numbers 2 to 33 (2 ATO to 33 ATO) had steel framed bodies of four bay construction with an additional short bay at the back of the lower deck. These buses were of ‘Orion’ style but had flush interiors (i.e. there was no inset around the window, this was to be found on the outside). These bodies were known as Mark Vs. The 1959 deliveries, fleet numbers 34 to 45 (34 ATO to 45 ATO), had alloy frames and again were of ‘Orion’ style and of four bay construction, with the additional small bay on the lower deck and flush interiors as the 1958 deliveries. These bodies were known as Mark IVs.

Michael Elliott


02/01/14 – 17:54

This photo of Nottingham 27 shows very well the inset windows that Michael refers to, except at the front of the upper deck, where the windows are part of the frameless dome structure. However, the same does not seem to be true at the rear. http://tinyurl.com/qg7rgh7

Peter Williamson


31/01/14 – 09:00

It’s interesting that Peter says that Rochdale’s aversion to Leylands could be due to the lack of a fluid transmission variant – because Leyland could be persuaded to provide fluid transmission if the operator was important enough. London Transport being the obvious example, but there was the less well-known batch of pre-selector PD2s supplied to Leeds in the early 50s, possibly in an attempt to remain a third alternative to AEC and Daimler. It must have worked because from then on Leeds purchased a sizable fleet of semi-auto PD3s. Possibly Rochdale was seen as less important – it would be interesting to see if the tenders specified fluid transmission and whether Leyland submitted bids. There was an article in “Buses Extra” several years ago on my local operator, Stockport Corporation and the fact that so many tenders were received from different suppliers – had Stockport not been so wedded to the PD2/PD3 one can only conjecture what might have been.

Michael Keeley


01/02/14 – 17:47

Very informative article and comments; as a schoolboy in the late 50s and early 60s. I travelled to school from Heywood to Manchester via Manchester’s routes 4 or 63. I understand that route 4, Manchester Cannon Street to Bamford was technically a joint service between Manchester and Rochdale corporations but Rochdale never operated their vehicles on this route, does anyone know why? (How I would have enjoyed travelling on one of those immaculately turned out Regent Vs; especially in the original livery.)

John Davies


02/02/14 – 06:48

The #4 to Norden was a vestige of the original 1928 #1 express service from Gatley to Norden. A joint Rochdale/Manchester operation this may have been in name only as I have never seen any photographic evidence of a Rochdale vehicle at Gatley. After WW2 the route was definitely only operated by MCTD, probably as part of a balancing arrangement with Rochdale regarding input into routes 4, 8 and 17

Phil Blinkhorn


02/02/14 – 11:31

It is correct that MCTD service #4 was a joint service with Rochdale from the outset until the cessation of MCTD in 1969 but it was always operated by Manchester vehicles, latterly mainly by the Daimler CCG6’s foisted on Queens Rd garage.
It was a common feature of MCTD joint services for only one party to operate the service. Out of nearly 90 joint service routes in 1969 no less than 25 services were provided by only one operator though there were occasional instances of the other operator(s) fielding a bus as a revenue sharing ploy or to cover breakdowns etc.
I would have loved to have seen a Rochdale Regent making it’s way to Gatley via Kingsway or Wilmslow Rd had the 1920’s arrangements persisted.

Orla Nutting

North West Independents – Book Review

One of the recent titles from Venture Publications is Neville Mercer’s review of Independent Bus Operators in North West England, number 31 in the Super Prestige series. Although I have been based in Hampshire for over 40 years, my roots are in the North West, Bolton and Lancaster to be precise, so I had to buy a copy! I still have relatives in Lancashire and Westmorland. I visit several times a year – often as a day trip, which used to amaze some of my office colleagues.

Neville makes one very interesting omission – Lancashire United – for two reasons. In many sources, this firm is considered to be one of the biggest independents, if not the biggest in Lancashire. Neville begs to differ. His view is that – like West Riding – it was not a family concern or run under the control of a group of local residents (like Barton, for example), but based on a tramway undertaking which had its offices and directors in London, so it wasn’t truly independent. If this isn’t enough, Neville refers to the company history published not long ago. The ground’s been covered already. Why go over it again? I have to agree with him. Given the formula for this series, including any more thoughts than these few on LUT would have reduced the available space for some real gems.

Another feature of Neville’s review is that, like so many of us, he ignores the political meddlers and returns Warrington to Lancashire (from Cheshire) and Grange Over Sands and other parts of the Furness peninsula to Lancashire (from Cumbria). Carlisle is, of course, in Cumberland. Neville starts with a lengthy overview, followed by sections on Cumberland and Westmorland, Lancashire and Cheshire.

There is a section on each of the firms, about many of which a lot of us never knew, and others will have forgotten. Neville discusses the early pioneers and the involvement of the railways. There are references to Crosville, Cumberland and Ribble and their various acquisition strategies, but most of the book considers the likes of Blair & Palmer of Carlisle, Brownrigg of Egremont, Fishwick & Sons of Leyland, the Grange Motor and Cycle Company of Grange Over Sands, Robinson of Appleby, Sowerby of Gilsland and many more. Most photographs are in black and white, but there are several pages of views in colour. The Mountain Goat’s services are considered but, on balance, he decides to exclude it from closer scrutiny, with the sentiment that “it won’t starve”!
I found it to be a good read, and well worth the pain inflicted on my wallet!

Pete Davies

01/2014


19/02/14 – 06:26

Can you tell me where I could purchase a copy of the Independent Bus Operators in North West England.
My grandfather and Father ran a Coach Company in Ambleside

Sue Conway

Ps. My family name is Faulkner, and the coach company was Browns Coaches of Ambleside

19/02/14 – 13:50

I bought my copy directly from MDS Book Sales (128 Pikes Lane, Glossop, Derbyshire, SK13 8EH) for £18.75 plus P&P. The ISBN is 978190530 4561 and the Browns of Ambleside enterprise is mentioned under McGregor of Ambleside, on pages 78, 79 and 80 – two illustrations in black and white are on 78. There are no illustrations in the colour section.

Pete Davies

19/02/14 – 17:39

The posting about Browns of Ambleside reminded me that I had a photo of JM 8303 seen when new in Hull with a Barnaby body.


Not sure if this is in the North West book!

Mike Davies

20/02/14 – 06:37

No, Mike, it isn’t, but 7316 is!!!

Pete Davies

Guernsey Motors/Railways Fleet Number 77

A 1958 Albion Victor FT39KAN with a Reading FB35F body Registration 8226 – YFO 127

Guernsey fleet number 77, an Albion Victor followed a string of Albion’s supplied to Guernsey Motors and Guernsey Railway. Designed externally to look like coaches they are in fact buses, Licensed to carry 35 seated passengers and 7 standing, 27ft long and with a width limit of just 7ft (2.15mts) passengers were soon in “close contact” with their fellow travellers!

The engine a four cylinder Albion Diesel proved to be reliable, powerful for its size and economical (12 to 16mpg). The chassis has the benefit of being a straight ladder section design and as a result it was simple and strong. Ideal for Albion in that it was less costly to build and could be used as the basis for both bus and commercial vehicles. The rear wheels are driven by an overhead worm drive differential. The five speed constant mesh crash gear box is a delight, the gearstick is light to move, close at hand, precise and has a relatively short travel. The Victors were not fitted with overdrives and depending on rear axle ratios the top speed varies from 34 to 48 mph. 77 was originally fitted with a low ratio axle, 34mph, however during Brian Catchpoles ownership in the 1980’s and 90’s an ex Harrods van mid range axle was installed, 40mph! Magic! The KAN chassis as distinct to the earlier Victor AN chassis was given an up rated engine, brakes and road springs.

Red and White of Chepstow took over the Guernsey Railway in 1949 and Guernsey Motors in 1951. Red & White were associated with the Albion agents “Watts of Lydney” and henceforth Albion was the preferred supplier. A total of 39 Albion Victors were added to the fleet the last in 1958. The Albion Victor chassis was designed as a rugged and lightweight chassis aimed at UK mainland rural bus operations and the overseas market. The body was designed specifically by Mr. J.A. Davies, the Guernsey Railway Co. Managing Director. J.A.Davies had come from the Newbury & District Bus Company, a company owned by Red & White Mr J.A.Davies was impressed with the external appearance of their late 1930’s Duple bodied coaches.

Guernsey operated school, private hire, service, and island tour schedules and wished to imply to its travellers, tourists in particular that it operated a fleet of luxury coaches. With this in mind and J.A.Davies preference for the Duple style, the Guernsey body naturally followed the Duple Vista outline, but with bus instead of coach seats. This reduced the number of vehicles required and significantly improved the flexibility of the fleet. Interestingly the Duple Vista bodies J.A.Davies saw were essentially of pre-war design starting life in 1936.

The dual purpose Heaver body’s appearance hardly changed from 1950 to 1958. In 1956 Heavers stopped supplying the wooden framed composites bodies and changed to an all aluminium framed body designed by the British Aluminium Company, there were many minor changes but the most obvious was the loss of the inset windows and flared lower panels resulting in a completely flat side. In 1957 Heavers ceased trading and “Reading and Company” of Hilsea near Portsmouth started manufacturing the same design bodies for Guernsey, Readings continued to supply the same body until the last Albion had entered service in late 1958, However a similar style of body was constructed until 1973 on the Nimbus and Bedford J4 chassis the very last being made by Sparshatt’s of Southampton.

I purchased six Albion Victors from the company at the St Peter Port auction in 1980, five for friends and number 77 for myself. A challenging exercise, three friends came with me and enough batteries for one bus. The buses came back in threes, three by the roll on roll off Channel Islands Ferry and three as freight on the Commodore Clipper where they were stowed below decks and craned off in Portsmouth. 77 came on the roll on roll off service with the only set of batteries, the other two buses being” Tow Start Only”. Our arrival at Portsmouth in the dark involved driving 77 out of the ship, turning round and returning on ship to tow start the other two buses in reverse (We could only tow from the front of the buses ie nose to nose), not a popular move with Chanel Island Ferries. All was not over as I had purchased all the Albion spares from the company, these were in twenty five Jonny Walker boxes with the lids stuck down. Initially the customs officer’s eyes bulged with excitement, however some hours later we were “released” leaving a very disappointed Customs man on the quay side.

In 1981 I realised that owning three Victors (JMT 10 and NKO 953 Fuggles) and only having garage space for two was a disaster in the making and 77 was sold to Brian Catchpole. Brian obtained an early EN286 engine that had not been used, but required attention, he rebuilt the engine, re-panelled and re-painted the bus and looked after it until the turn of the century.

Finding empty space in my the garage enabled me to buy back 77 and use it for another five years, this included using it to transfer the wedding guests to and from the church when I got married. The arrival of a 1944 6X6 GMC truck put space at a premium and something had to go so the Albion passed on to Martin Willetts.

In two thousand and nine, I had regained a bus space in the garage and coincidently Martin wanted to sell the Albion! You have guessed it, I purchased the bus for the third time. A new ceiling, a rebuild of the rear mudguards the fitting of a new set of injectors, a new coat of paint, the reinstatement of the life guards and the original go faster stripes has put the bus back on the road again looking much as it did originally. The bus is now used on the occasional free bus service and to visit places of interest with friends and family.

For the purist 77 was supplied new in red and marked up as Guernsey Motors, it remained red for all it life but was moved from the “Motors” fleet to the “Guernsey Railways” fleet in the 1960’s. It now appears as a “Railways” bus.

The Guernsey Albion’s are a preservationists delight, virtually no wood to go rotten, only two steel panels to go rusty on the body, booking in at four tons ULW its relatively easy to work on, One person can easily take the cylinder off and change the engine if need be. Economical 14 to 15 mpg on long runs and 12 mpg n locals. Only 7ft wide but still carrying 35 passengers. Half drop windows, an art deco interior and almost pre-war body adds up to a very period bus with a unique appearance.

I could of course be biased having owned at one time or another.

15591937 ex The Grays, Guernsey
KCD 6971949 ex St Dunstans and Hovis
64361950 Guernsey 36 a bus that was cut in half and converted to a breakdown vehicle
NKO 9531950 ex Fuggles
64421954 Guernsey 52
804 FUF1954 Ex Jersey Motor Transport 10 – J 15213
8227 – JPA 83V – (YFO 127)1958 Guernsey 77

I was also fortunate in being able to “rescue” another six Guernsey Victors by purchasing and importing the buses on behalf of friends. They were all Guernsey Albion Victors.

UK RegGuernsey regFleet no
DS 6468617363
JPA 81V402973
JPA 82V402272
JPA 83V – YFO 127822777
JPA 84V822878
JPA 85V822676
JPA 86V – 842 FUF676866

You may ask what happened to JPA 83Vs Registration number and JPA 86V’s? My bus now YFO 127 was initially issued with JPA 83V and Brian Catchpole obtained the age related number, Noel Marshall did the same with 66.

In 1980 age related registration numbers were almost unheard of, and Surrey would only allocate suffix lettered registration numbers appropriate to the year of importation. The issue was further complicated in that I insisted the buses were issued with six digit reg. numbers to fit into the rear number plate box the modern seven digits were too long. I had to wait some three months for the JPA sequence to start. Eventually the Road Tax Office called to advise “Apply Now” we are issuing the JPA numbers. (No DVLA in those days)

Further history and Information on Guernsey and its buses can be found in two very comprehensive books “Guernsey Bus and Coach Fleet History” and “A History of Guernsey’s Buses, Coaches and Trams” both by John Carman.

Peter Davies

02/2014


09/02/14 – 08:15

My attention was caught by Peter Davies`s post of Guernsey Motors No 77 and I send you a few of my old slides from my first visit to the island in 1971 (flew by Vickers Viscount from East Midlands Airport).

A selection of views and I think among these are a good cross-section of the public transport on offer, I well remember being captivated by the retro charm of the island buses. and how they met the dimensional challenges of the island roads.

Rob Hancock