The First PTEs – Part One – Ashton under Lyne

Not read from the beginning, click here

With its blind already set for the next outward journey, LTC 768 a 1950 H30/26R PD2/3 travels along Warrington Street, unrecognisable today, towards the bus station. Route 128 was originally trolleybus route 217. Haughton Green was a small village beyond Denton which lost its rural aspect in the late 1950s when Manchester built large overspill estates in the area.

The PD2 was one of a batch of 10, originally numbered 2-7, 9, 23, 25 and 76 which were renumbered 1-10 in 1960. The renumbering matched the last number of the registration with the fleet number LTC 770, originally 76, becoming number 10.

The photo was taken after the inception of SELNEC, so the coat of arms and the Gothic fleet name script are missing. The unrepaired tree damage and grubby bonnet were unusual for Ashton and is indicative of many depots’ reaction to the takeover. I travelled to and from primary school many times on this and other vehicles of the batch in 1952 and 1953 on the prestige service 9 between Ashton and Rochdale. In those days the bus was resplendent in the dark blue, white and red livery.

The bus was one of only four operated by SELNEC of the eight that passed to them from Ashton and became 5406 in the fleet, being finally withdrawn in 1970 though it survived in the Mossley Rd garage yard in Ashton blue and cream well into 1974, probably as long as it would have lasted with Ashton.

XTC 854 is a Bond bodied Guy originally fleet number 39 and renumbered to 67 in 1964. One of four H32/28R Guy Arab IVs originally bought in 1956 specifically for the number 14 Ashton to Mossley service which, with its long drag up to the Hartshead area from Ashton and the even harder, sharp ascent from Mossley, gave problems to the Leylands in the fleet.

Bond was a short lived but highly reputable body builder in Wythenshawe, Manchester. Ashton was its biggest customer with rebodied and new trolleybuses as well as the Guys. With its preferred body builders Crossley and Leyland either out of or about to leave the marketplace, Bond looked set to gain Ashton’s future business – as well as many other customers – but labour disputes ruined the company and Ashton had to look elsewhere.

All four passed to SELNEC – the only Guys in the fleet, though Bolton contributed some Bond bodied Leylands – and this bus became 5467. Photographed on the western edge of Ashton Bus Station the bus is devoid of any logo, crest or title to the offside observer. I’ve not found a confirmed withdrawal date for the batch but memory says 1971, again in blue and cream, as part of SELNEC’s determination to reduce the average age of the fleet, slightly frustrated by the delay in delivery of Fleetlines and Atlanteans.

Following the demise of Bond, Ashton followed its next door neighbour, Oldham, to Crossgates, Leeds and for the next four batches of double deckers ordered 65 seat traditional bodies on PD2/40 chassis with traditional radiators. 19 NTD was number 19 in the fleet from the first batch delivered in 1960. 1965 saw a fifth batch but with the forward entrance version of the body on PD2/37 chassis.

Ashton followed Oldham in another regard in so far as, in the last days of its independence it placed the coat of arms and script on the between decks forward panels and, in Ashton’s case, the legal lettering followed “upstairs”.

Photographed on Portland St, Manchester, on the southern edge of Piccadilly Gardens and bus station, 19 is on former trolleybus service 218 from Stalybridge via Ashton and Ashton Old Rd.

19 became 5419 in the SELNEC fleet and was repainted in fleet colours though it didn’t survive into GMT days, having a much shorter life than envisioned by either its makers or its original owner.

Though Ashton’s fleet was relatively small, never exceeding 50 vehicles, it moved with the times. In 1966 it took eight Atlanteans bodied by Roe and followed these with a batch of PDR1A/1 Atlanteans in 1969 bodied by Northern Counties to H43/28D fitted for OMO.

The last of these was PTF 861G, fleet number 61 which was delivered after the inauguration of SELNEC in basic Ashton colours with SELNEC Southern legal lettering. Taken on Penny Meadow, Ashton, the birthplace of actress Amanda Barrie, 61 is already grubby though it has reflective number plates, legalised just before delivery. Eventually becoming 5461 and gaining SELNEC livery the bus survived until 1982 by which time it was part of the GMT fleet.

After the formation of SELNEC, a number of outstanding orders from the constituent Corporations were delivered in SELNEC livery, some had details amended by the new operator prior top delivery, others were – colour scheme apart – to the standard
specified by the departments which ordered them. Ashton had a repeat batch of Northern Counties bodied Atlanteans to the same specification as the 1969 batch on order for 1970. Five were ordered but only four were delivered these being VTE 162H to VTE 165H and these appeared as 5462-5465. A further order to the same specification was placed for 1971 but this and the last one of the 1970 order were cancelled with Northern Counties and the six PDR1A/1 chassis received newly designed Northern Counties bodies to SELNEC’s new standard design, serving as single doorway prototypes. Originally numbered EX1-EX6, they later became 5466-5471 having the Manchester registrations PNF 941J-PNF 946J.

The last bus built to Ashton’s specifications, VTE 165H is a Northern Counties bodied H43/28D PDR1A/1 Atlantean delivered in 1970. Numbered 5465 I suspect it is turning close to the bus station. The all Leyland double decker in the background is a bit of a mystery. It isn’t ex Ashton as it has sliding vents rather than half drop windows. Is it a canteen as the earlier facilities opposite the fire station closed when the new bus station opened and I have a nagging feeling it was a while before facilities opened at the new site.

Copy by Phil Blinkhorn – Photographs by Roger Cox

08/2013

 

Click here to view Part Two – SHMD Board

 


03/08/13 – 07:15

One note regarding SELNEC fleet numbers. Only one Ashton bus carried its SELNEC fleet number on the blue livery and this was the last repaint into the blue livery, PD2 5436. Buses were only renumbered on repaint and of the SELNEC constituents Ashton was unique in this regard.

A couple of minor points. Oldham changed their livery but continued hand painting into GMT days. I believe the only municipal spray facilities were those in Manchester and Rochdale and brush painting remained the norm elsewhere.

There is also a typo in the SELNEC number of the first vehicle featured which was allocated the number 5408. Ironically the bus that would have been 5406 was the only one of the batch to gain orange livery, but this had been cut down as a towing vehicle just before the formation of SELNEC. It was preserved for a time, as also was sister 7. It’s a real shame the latter didn’t survive as they looked magnificent in original livery.

David Beilby


03/08/13 – 07:17

I was a member of a group who tried to preserve one of the Leyland bodied PD2s.This was on a farm somewhere in darkest Lancashire.We went one Saturday and after a long time using a farm tractor we managed to get the bus to start .The leader of the group the late John Leadbeater drove lorrys for a company in Batley West Yorkshire and he was given permission to park the bus at the depot Alas shortly afterwards before any serious work could be carried out John had to leave and so the bus had to go too.I think efforts were made to find another home but this was fruitless and so the bus went to PVS at Barnsley.I cannot remember the bus registration but I do recall Downing Street on the destination blind.

Philip Carlton


03/08/13 – 07:18

For clarification does the reference to ‘George Hilditch’ refer to G G Hilditch, who held various posts in the ‘municipal bus industry’, latterly being the General Manager at Leicester City Transport, and who generally titled himself as Geoffrey Hilditch?

Michael Elliott


03/08/13 – 08:00

Thanks for your comments David. Re painting, Manchester and Rochdale certainly had spray booths and as far as I remember, so did North Western. I’m surprised about Oldham as I understood the dreadful pommard and cream was sprayed. Before I write the piece on Salford can anyone confirm the simplification of the livery to a single cream stripe and overall green was to, as I’ve understood it for years, allow simple spraying.

Phil Blinkhorn


03/08/13 – 09:43

Michael, you’ve picked up an error missed by three of us who read the proof!

Phil Blinkhorn


05/08/13 – 08:13

One point not made in the text but highlighted by the last two pictures is that the Smallshaw Circular and the Hurst Circular followed the same route but in opposite directions.

The routes involved some long flat stretches and some steady but fairly easy climbs. Heavily loaded at peak periods as Smallshaw and Hurst contained 1920s council houses where many workers from the town and Manchester resided, the routes passed the depot and were the nominated running in turns for new and off maintenance vehicles as no part of the routes was more than ten minutes drive from the depot.

Phil Blinkhorn


05/08/13 – 08:13

I was at first surprised to read that Ashton’s Guys were purchased to cope with hills that Leylands were having difficulty with, since Gardner’s 8.4 litres were never a match for Leyland’s 9.8. But then I remembered once reading something similar about Northern General using 5HLW-powered Guy single deckers on their hilliest routes. This cannot be about performance, so I can only assume it’s something to do with Gardners staying cool when other engines get all hot and bothered.

Whatever the reason, they sounded very nice, and I also liked the Bond bodies very much. In retrospect they remind me of earlier de-Manchesterised Crossley bodies, as shown at this link.

Peter Williamson


05/08/13 – 10:41

Peter, you may well be right regarding the cooling. I had cousins of a similar age who lived in Hazelhurst overlooking the route and I spent many weekend and summer holiday days with them. Before the Guys arrived I recall seeing overheated Leylands pulled in on the Mossley side of the Gorsey Lane, Mossley Rd junction eventually being “refreshed” by the staff of the adjacent motor repair garage.

In addition to regular traffic Hartshead Pike, for which the stop was at the highest point on the route, was a great draw for people at weekends and during the summer so loads were often heavy. As I recall the Guys were the only type that didn’t appear on the 1 and 3 Circulars during their initial running in.

Phil Blinkhorn


28/08/13 – 06:00

I recall the “mystery bus” in the background of the photo of 5465. It was an ex Bolton all-Leyland PD2 which was converted to a mobile church. It spent quite some time in Ashton.

John Hibbert


28/08/13 – 12:32

Thanks for clearing that up John

Phil Blinkhorn


29/08/13 – 06:40

I am a native of Rochdale and discovered the buses of Ashton Corporation when I started to attend Secondary School (Rochdale Technical) which was in Rochdale town centre.

I always remember the destination blinds of Ashton buses which were ‘economical’ with their text. Buses arrived in Rochdale showing ‘Rochdale via Oldham’. On departing they would show ‘Via Oldham Ashton’. The ‘Via Oldham’ being the same words displayed in both directions. The conductor would only have to make a minimal number of turns of the destination blind winder making Rochdale disappear and Ashton show up.

In Phil’s article there are two photos illustrating another example of the sharing of destination blind text in the word ‘Circular’ which was shared as ‘Hurst Circular’ on one hand and ‘Circular Smallshaw’ on the other.

No doubt there were various other examples on the Ashton blinds. Another operator serving Rochdale that used this method of using shared text was Hebble.

David Slater


29/08/13 – 10:41

The practice of saving space on blinds in this manner was not uncommon. Manchester, for instance, did something similar on the via blinds using 5 lines to cover 6 points. Thus, a outward journey of service #40 would show ‘Victoria Park, Birch Park, Kingsway’ and inward would show ‘Kingsway, Birch Park, Victoria Park’.

Orla Nutting


11:08

John,

I wonder if this mobile church was ex-Bolton 408 (DBN 311) which was sold to “Gospel Bus, Norley, Frodsham” in March 1966, and is now preserved.

For a while this owner had ex-Aldershot & District AEC Reliance/Weymann 370 (XHO 370), which I photographed in a field in Frodsham on 30/12/1986.

It later moved to Northern Ireland and later to preservation in A&D livery, having been exchanged for a single-deck Atlantean TBK 197K, ex-Portsmouth. See it at this link.

Dave Farrier


29/08/13 – 19:14

Manchester via blinds came in 3 varieties until 1958: totally informative with 3 waypoints listed, the partially informative such as Limited Stop and All Night Service (which to the initiated indicated that double fare was in operation) or the confusingly hopeless where a blank portion of the blind was shown and, of course, the equally opaque use of the word FOG, meant to show the bus was running off the time table due to fog somewhere (normally in the suburbs) but which meant nothing to the intending passenger. The 1958 opening of the Kingsway extension and the use of the road to bypass the log jam that was Cheadle village led to route 1, which always showed Limited Stop, being split into the 161 and 162. This created a new subset on Parrs Wood depot via blinds which could then be set to show Limited Stop via Cheadle for the former or Limited Stop via Kingsway for the latter.

There was some intelligent use of the via blinds for football specials with destinations of Old Trafford and Maine Rd, both of which appeared on the destination blinds for service buses, the latter being a short working point on the 123 when it was converted from the 213 trolleybus service, rather than Moss Lane East which had been the trolleybus short working. The football specials had special fares and would, even when not full, ignore ordinary passengers at bus stops. The destination blind would thus be set to Football Match and the via blind would show either Old Trafford or City Ground (strangely not Maine Rd!)

Orla’s explanation of the use of the blinds when 3 waypoints were shown is as the system was supposed to be used but there is a mass of photo evidence to show many crews couldn’t be bothered about turning the blind handle even one revolution and the blinds are often seen as set in reverse direction to the service.

Phil Blinkhorn


12/05/14 – 09:01

The Guy Arab IVs were withdrawn in 1970.

The 4th photo, of No.61 is on Warrington Street, not on Penny Meadow.

The 5th photo, shows VTE 165H turning from Warrington Street into the bus station.

The Guys were not the only type that didn’t appear on circulars 1 and 3 on initial running in turns. The front entrance PD2s, the Roe bodied Atlanteans and single deckPanther Cubs did not.

Dave Ward


13/05/14 – 08:50

Thanks Dave for your clarification re the withdrawal date for the Guys. Your comment re the running in turns surprises me, apart from the Panther Cubs perhaps, as the Guys were such a notable exception to the norm and, apart from my own information, I’ve seen the same statements about running in turns elsewhere.

Thanks also for correcting the location of photo #4.

Phil Blinkhorn


14/05/14 – 06:11

Besides being parked in the Mossley Road depot on delivery, the first time I saw the front entry PD2s in service was on the 127 Haughton Green and 30 Edgeley services. They very rarely ventured on to the circular services. And if they did, were replaced assoon as a rear platform PD2became available The Roe bodied Atlanteans were known as “trolleybus replacement vehicles” and entered service on the 218/219 from new. They did not appear on the circulars until one man operation commenced. The Letters of their registration numbers was YTE, the same as the trolleybuses that they replaced. The Panther Cubs were used on the 4 to Park Bridge and the 2 Gambrel Bank Circular and after one man operation commenced were the normal Sunday vehicle on the 14 Mossley service.

Dave Ward


14/05/14 – 08:29

The Panther Cubs appeared on the 5 (Droylsden to Smallshaw) service when new and I rode on them from Droylsden to Ashton as part of a more convoluted route home from school occasionally.

David Beilby


15/05/14 – 07:45

David.
The 5 Droylsden service was the first to be converted to omo in 1967, which is the year the Panther Cubs were delivered. They were E registered, meaning they were registered prior to 1st August. 1967 is also the year of the creation of route 2 Gambrel Bank Circular, which was single deck operated from the outset by the Panther Cubs. Only one vehicle was required. As I recall,the service was not an all day service, which enabled the same vehicle to operate the equally infrequent 4 to Park Bridge. Whilst not doubting that the Panther Cubs appeared on the 5, the first of the 1966 Atlanteans had been fitted for omo in 1967 for service 5, which was Ashton’s first omo service of that era.

The first new vehicles would usually appear on 3, Hurst Circular, appearing on 1, Smallshaw Circular the following day. Two vehicles were required for each circular route. I recall that when I first moved to Ashton that two of the 1955 (UTB) PD2s at that time the newest Leylands in the fleet) would be on one circular with two of the 1950 (LTC), PD2s on the other. This then changed every other day, with the vehicle type changing circular. eg: UTBs on Hurst Circular and LTBs on Smallshaw Circular on a Monday with Tuesday finding a pair of UTBs on the Smallshaw and a pair of LTCs on the Hurst, then Wednesday as Monday. When the first Roe PD2/40s were delivered in 1960, this arrangement continued with a pair of them alternating every other day with a pair of the UTB batch Crossley PD2/12s. From 1962, with the delivery of the second batch of the RoePD2/40s, this practice continued, but both circulars had RoePD2/40s operating them. However, as I already mentioned, this practice ceased with the delivery of the front entry Roe PD2/37 in 1965, these vehicles not entering service and saw little use on the circulars.

I have a theory regarding new vehicles and their initial entry to service on the circular routes and why this practice changed in 1965. It possibly had nothing to do with running in turns.

T.P. O’Donnell became General Manager at Ashton in 1954. When I returned to live in Ashton in 1957, O’Donnell lived just four houses from where my family lived on Broadoak Road. He left Ashton for Northampton in either 1963 or 1964. 1964 was the year the last Roe PD2/40 rear platform were delivered and the last to enter service on the Smallshaw and Hurst Circulars. Was it O’Donnell who insisted that at least two of his newest buses operated past his house every day, a practice that started from his arrival in 1954 and ended when he left in 1963/4? We shall probably never know, but it is a possibility.

Dave Ward


15/05/14 – 17:43

Dave may well have a point about Mr O’Donnell and the use of new vehicles on the circulars. This could be amplified by the fact that the first vehicle in the peacock livery, a GTJ registered Crossley, appeared on both routes just prior to Christmas 1954 on what had been Leyland territory for some while. Mr O’D showing off to the neighbours?

After he left things may well have changed but I rode on 45 on the 1 and 42 on the 3 when a few days old in 1965. This may have been a case of depot staff following tradition, at this remove we will probably never know.

Phil Blinkhorn


21/06/14 – 15:28

I suspect the photo of LTC 768 showing “Haughton Green 128” shouldn’t take long to put a date to. I spent the first 44 years of my life domiciled in Haughton Green, and seem to remember the 128 variation only being introduced in the late 60s, towards the end of both Ashton Corpy’s separate existence, and of the bus pictured. Technically, trolleybus 217 – and who’d have thought a “rural village” could justify the investment of trolleys instead of motorbuses – became motorbus 127 in 1960, when buses simply ran up Two Trees Lane and turned right onto Haughton Green road, before turning round opposite the Jolly Hatters and returning whence it came. The council “overspill” estate necessitated the introduction of circulars, with the 127 continuing clockwise round the estate, and anti-clockwise journeys introduced as 128s. Around 1980, Greater Manchester Transport renumbered them 347/348 respectively, and de-reg resulted in the 348 being dropped in favour of a “frequent intervals” 347 as it is now.
Interesting to note also that the front entrance PD2s were initially allocated to 127s in favour of Ashton locals. By SELNEC days, when “standard” Fleetlines stuck rigidly to buses heading North out of the bus Station, and the 127/128 never seeing anything newer than the EXx Atlanteans until the arrival of the superb Scanias for the Trans-Lancs Express.

Phil Longdon


21/11/14 – 06:30

I was brought up in Ashton in the 60’s and lived in Cedar Street, Kenworthy Avenue (Hurst) and latterly Willshaw Lane.
My earliest memory was the number 7 running along Curzon Road and Kings Road operated by old wartime Guys, rebodied by Roe in the fifties, until replaced by the all Leyland Titans.
We moved to Hurst so used the Circulars or the 7 to get into town. The Roe bodied PD2s with rear entrances were the usual vehicles but I do recall catching, only once, a forward entrance version. The number 5 initially had the single deckers in use and later the Trolley Bus replacement Atlanteans.
The number 2 started after we moved to Willshaw Lane. A variety of vehicles were used on this including the Guy Arab/Bond vehicles, all Leyland PD2s, PD2/Roes and the two single deckers.
I own the surviving PD2/Roe rear entrance vehicle no. 39, which has been stored securely under cover for a number of years, and I am hoping to start its restoration shortly.

David Wilson


16/11/15 – 06:26

Just revisited this page after quite a while:-

PD2 no.8 survived longer than the other three because it became a driver trainer.

Route 5 was the first “one man” route (to use contemporary description!) and was initially operated by the two Panther Cubs. I lived at the village store in Littlemoss at the time and as a young boy was greatly impressed with their “luxury” compared to the PD2/3s of the 1-10 batch which had been the regular performers. Prior to the permitting of double deck one person operation, the 1966 Atlanteans were later used in a cunning scheme where the top decks were closed off by way of a wooden panel at the bottom of the stairs making a single decker for legal purposes – the panel being easily removable to return the bus to its full capacity. Route 5 needed two vehicles for its regular timetable, which would have made it the ideal choice for the conversion.

Another feature of the route which I recall is that for several weeks prior to their withdrawal in December 1966 the last two utility Guys, 72 and 74, were the regular all day performers in place of the usual PD2s, having been “spare” buses for some time.

John Hibbert


06/03/16 – 06:37

A couple of points from the excellent Ashton article. Regarding the appearances of newer/recently overhauled buses on the 1 and 3 Circulars I was always led to believe that this was in part due to the fact that quite a number of Ashton councillors lived on the routes. This bolstered by the fact that Mr O Donnell also lived on Broadoak Road makes sense. The practice continued under Mr Griffiths tenure.

As for those 4 Bond bodied Guy Arab IVs as a lad I remember them appearing on an evening peak trip from Guide Bridge into Ashton and then right through onto the 7 route to Hazelhurst. I frequently caught them home to the top of Hazelhurst after trainspotting trips to Guide Bridge station. I cannot recall what route number they displayed. A photo of 67 on Kings Road returning to Ashton after one of these trips is attached. This was taken after the formation of SELNEC as it has lost the coat of arms.

I also have vivid memories of the Crossley re-bodied Austerity Arabs on the 7 running past our house with bonnet side panels resting on the nearside wings for extra cooling in summer.This seems to contradict the idea of them being used on the 14 because they ran cooler than the Leylands. I was once told that the Leylands struggled up out of Brookbottom if they had to stop halfway up. This was because of the difficulty of starting in 1st gear and making the change to 2nd on the hill without losing momentum.

A final memory is that no. 5 out of the LTC batch of Leylands was converted to a run around/tow wagon and spent much of its time in the bus station with compressed air bottles to rescue ailing Atlanteans suffering with air system problems.

Steve Hyde


07/03/16 – 06:15

A new entry in the comments area prompts a new study of previous ones! Dave Ward and Phil Blinkhorn wondered a while back about a Manager’s insistence that his newest buses should be on the route passing his house (or not, as the case may be!)

There was a vaguely similar situation in Southampton a few years back, involving a bus stop and a disabled parking bay. One of the Transport Department’s Inspectors lived at the house in question, and he wanted a stop outside his house, for ease of getting to and from work. His wife had what was then an orange badge, and there was no parking facility at the property. The lady went out to work, and used the car to go to and from her work, so the bay was vacant during the day, when the buses were running, but occupied in the evening, when they were not.

In those days, rules on the issue of parking bays, and who was allowed to use them was far more ‘regulated’ than it is now. It might seem strange, but this arrangement worked. It shouldn’t have of course but that’s like the bumble bee and the laws of physics and aerodynamics. Theoretically, the bee can’t fly but nobody’s told it, so it does!

Pete Davies


19/04/16 – 06:20

I drove buses from Ashton depot for over 10 yrs, the bus pictured in SELNEC colours number 5465 on the hurst circular route had quite a chequered history. It constantly had braking issues when carrying heavy loads down hill. As I was a union rep, eventually we refused to drive it and it was black listed. Many years later and living in N. Wales a driver with GMT was suing them after getting injured when the brakes failed on 5465 and wanted me to give evidence for him.

Larry Smith

Oldham Corporation – Leyland Titan PD2 – NBU 508 – 408

Oldham Corporation - Leyland Titan PD2 - NBU 508 - 408

Oldham Corporation
1957
Leyland Titan PD2/20
Crossley H33/28R

This picture shows Ashton-under-Lyne Corporation Transport XTC 855 and Oldham Corporation Passenger Transport NBU 508 in Oldham’s Wallshaw Street Depot.

NBU 508_2

The photograph shows the cast fleet number plate that was a feature of the Oldham fleet at that time.
In this view 408s Coat of Arms is on the lower deck panel, until, like Ashton, they were moved to the front upper deck panels. This was to save the costs of replacement when damage occurred due to accidents.
The Service 3 was Middleton to Rushcroft.
408 was renumbered as 5308 in the SELNEC fleet in November 1969.
The picture shows the vast expanse of the roof of Wallshaw Street depot. The Garage roof having only 3 stanchions, supporting girders with spans of over 200ft.
Ashton XTC 855 was one of the Guy Arab IVs with Bond H32/28R bodywork delivered as No. 40 in 1956. Here it has Fleet No. 68 which it received in 1964. It was renumbered 5468 at the formation of SELNEC in November 1969.
It can be seen that the Corporation crest and lettering is in the normal position before being moved to the upper deck front panel (as shown in the photograph of No. 19 in Part One – Ashton under Lyne article by Phil Blinkhorn and Roger Cox).
It is in Oldham Garage, showing Service 8 which was the joint Oldham, Ashton, & SHMD service between Oldham and Stalybridge via Hurst Cross.

Photograph and Copy contributed by Stephen Howarth


12/09/13 – 16:30

Oldham 408 was numerically the first of five Leyland PD2/20 with Crossley bodies built to Park Royal design, after the takeover by the ACV group. Similar bodies were supplied to Ashton-Under-Lyne and Stockport Corporations at this time Crossley ceased body building soon after, although not before they had built the prototype Bridgemaster, which had many similarities to this body design. The Manchester independent A. Mayne and Son had three AEC Regent V with Park Royal bodywork to the same basic design (although in 30ft length.)
These bodies proved inferior to their contemporaries of other makes, and after takeover by Selnec PTE, 409 was overhauled and lasted in service until 1973, the rest of the batch were withdrawn in 1970.
Ashton-Under-Lyne Corporation was a Leyland User, and had only the one batch of Guy Arab IV’s. These were unusual in having exposed radiators and 5LW engines, as well as the relatively rare body make. I enjoyed several rides on these interesting buses from Ashton to Mossley, this route being their usual home.
I wonder why an Ashton bus was inside Oldham’s depot? At first I wondered if it was one of the many buses hired from other operators as a result of the disastrous visit by Ministry of transport inspectors in October 1965. However David Wayman’s book on Oldham buses states that there were no Ashton buses involved. Perhaps it had broken down in Oldham.

Don McKeown


13/09/13 – 06:30

An interesting photo of a neighbouring municipality’s vehicle interloping into the home fleet’s garage. I would venture this was a relatively rare occurrence in its day unless someone can enlighten us. The photo has made me realise what an attractive design the Bond bodies were in a fairly understated way. The Guy radiator looks a bit old fashioned and puts about 10 years on the body design though. The Birmingham tin front would have made them into really stunning buses. Bolton of course had similar bodies on exposed radiator Leyland PD2’s but somehow the Leyland radiator seemed to age much better and still looked good right up to the end of Titan production.

Philip Halstead


13/09/13 – 08:30

A number of points regarding Don’s comment. The Stockport PD2s with Crossley bodies to the same design didn’t have the same problems as the Oldham batch and some were sent to Oldham after SELNEC took over. As I’m away from home at present I can’t confirm actual vehicles used and the dates but the Stockport vehicles outlasted the Oldham and Ashton batches.
The Ashton Guys were specifically bought for the Mossley route – see my article on SELNEC Part One. They appeared on the 7 and 8 from time to time, both being regular Guy turns, more frequently operated with rebodied austerity Guys sporting 7 foot 6 in versions of the Crossley body shown in the picture.
What the bus is doing in the depot is a matter of conjecture. It certainly wasn’t a 1965 swap vehicle. A breakdown is possible but as there was always one of the batch spare and it may have been filling in for a broken down Oldham vehicle which came to grief in Ashton’s territory and would have been taken to Mossley Rd. Most of the joint services in the Manchester conurbation had vehicle swap arrangements should a vehicle come to grief in the territory of another operator.

Phil Blinkhorn


13/09/13 – 08:30

I know exactly what the Ashton Guy was doing in the Oldham garage and I even have the negative of this photo (although I didn’t take it). I’ve had to look very carefully as it is quite likely that very similar photographs were also taken.
Ashton 68 was on a tour organised by the Buckley Wells Bus Enthusiasts Society. It operated on 9th July 1967 and visited several locations in north Lancashire. Thanks to Stan Fitton, who organised the tour, I have photographs of the Ashton Guy next to Todmorden PD2s, a BCN Guy and an Accrington Wulfrunian. I hope in time to put these in a gallery recounting the history of the Society as I think many will find it an interesting story.
Although both these vehicles were allocated SELNEC fleet numbers neither carried them and in fact the Oldham PD2 had been withdrawn some time before SELNEC was formed.

David Beilby


13/09/13 – 16:30

I wonder why the blind was set for route number 8? Has David thwarted a ruse set 46 years ago to confuse future enthusiasts and historians? The date was my 20th birthday and I spent the day riding buses – far away from Oldham however.
They were two shades of green, exclusively single deck and carried a coat of arms containing the letters SPQR and a crown. I have in mind an article covering my wanderings on the city and country buses I used around Rome but am having problems finding relevant photos and accurate references to exact types.

Phil Blinkhorn


14/09/13 – 06:24

XTC 854

To quote Margaret Wolfe Hungerford, “Beauty is in the eye of the Beholder”. I consider the elegant and timeless Guy radiator on the Ashton Arab IVs to be much superior in appearance to the bulbous Birmingham style tin front. The best version of the Birmingham front was that fitted to the Dennis Lance K4 which had vertical chrome strips instead of the crude sausage shaped slots. Did these Ashton Arabs really have the 5LW engine? Hitherto, I understood the power plant to be the 6LW. Gardners were always cool runners, an effective oil cooler being an important feature of the engine design. The handsome Bond bodywork exhibits several similarities with contemporary five bay East Lancashire products. Perhaps Bond used the East Lancs frame. Then again, the Harkness bodies of the period had much the same appearance, and these used MetSec frames.

Roger Cox


14/09/13 – 16:19

Roger, as you are aware, I’m away at present but my memory and the references I can find on the Net all point to the 5LW engine. Bond used various frames inc Burlingham but I’ve no knowledge of any use of East Lancs frames and I’d doubt that the Blackburn concern would have supplied frames given just about every batch built by them in the 1950s and 1960s was unique, though I take your point about resemblance, especially the frontal appearance.
The Park Bridge service was an oddity. It followed the Oldham Rd to almost the boundary with Hathershaw then turned right down a winding road to Park Bridge, a hamlet established in the 18th century around an iron works. Its timings on weekdays were based around rush hours and a late evening service. Saturday saw an enhanced daytime service for shoppers but, until the closure of the Oldham to Guide Bridge and Stockport rail services in the Beeching era, the halt at Park Bridge provided a more frequent service though Oldham Rd station at Ashton was a good ten minutes walk from the market and shops, the final 200 yards back to the station being up a quite sharp gradient. The hamlet is now a heritage site with beautifully restored houses in a rural setting.

Phil Blinkhorn


15/09/13 – 07:25

Phil, your knowledge of the operators in the Manchester locality is rewardingly comprehensive, and, as you indicated in the Ashton article, these Guys must have been purchased for a specific reason. Nonetheless, it does seem extraordinary that Ashton should specify the 7 litre, 94 bhp 5LW engine to meet a situation that distressed a 9.8 litre, 125 bhp Leyland. The Gardner would assuredly climb a proverbial brick wall without overheating, but progress must have been decidedly sedate. On the subject of the body frames used by Bond, a contributor to the following website, named T W Moore (surely the well known bus photographer) suggests that Bond was an associated company of East Lancs (see the last post on the page):- //cwk205.freeforums.org/  
Do you think that this was the case?

Roger Cox


15/09/13 – 09:36

XTC 855

The attached photo shows the Ashton Guy at the start of this tour (and all the other Buckley Wells Bus Enthusiasts tours), Manchester Victoria station. 68 has as a backdrop the long-demolished buildings on Hunt’s Bank. The coach behind is unusual as it is a Setra from the Somme Département in France, as shown by the registration which ends with the number 80. Continental coaches were a rare sight in those days.
The blinds were set to all sorts of displays during the tour (it was an opportunity to practice this much-desired but usually not permitted activity). At Ashton it showed 159, certainly not an Ashton route, and a lot of time it showed the perennial favourite but incorrect Ashton display, “10 Downing Street”, which unfortunately came out as Downing St 10. Downing Street was a short working on the 5 to Droylsden via Littlemoss.

David Beilby


15/09/13 – 14:02

On the face of it the use of the 5LW looks odd but there may have been a very logical reason – at least in the minds of the members of the Transport Committee and the General Manager. The order was placed in the period in the 1950s when diesel prices and wages had escalated rapidly putting up costs against a background of increased availability of cars, an increase in home entertainment with a widening of TV output and a resistance against increased fares all of which produced a marked decline in passenger numbers.
Small and reduced output engines were not a rare phenomenon in the area and whilst the route to Mossley may have seemed to demand a large engine, a slow plodder which completed the journey, on what was a fairly relaxed schedule, was preferable to an enforced cooling stop or even a breakdown, which had become a regular and expensive enough occurrence. No other route in the system had such demands and the 5LW would have had a more racehorse like performance on the other routes to which Ashton’s Guys were allocated and to which the vehicles would eventually be tasked. I rode on both the Leylands and the Guys and whilst I was under ten at the time the Guys took over, I have memories of their stately progress compared to the rather raucous progress of the Leylands, which included much gear changing and stuttering starts from some of the bus stops on the steeper parts of the route, not to mention the overheating.
With regard to Bond, the posting linking the company to East Lancs contains a major nonsense in so far as it places the latter in Bridlington, not once but twice – hardly a typo. Apart from its own bodies Bond did finish bodies for other manufacturers and may well have taken the strain for East Lancs with the Coventry job but, as far as I have understood the rather obscure history of the company, it was totally independent of any other bus body builder, its demise in Wythenshawe coming about after protracted labour disputes between craft unions.

Phil Blinkhorn


15/09/13 – 16:50

Roger’s information with respect to the suggestion that the S.H. Bond concern was an associate of East Lancs. would go a long way towards explaining why the remainder of a batch of nine pre-war Bristol saloons of Rotherham Corporation, of which I think four had been rebodied by East Lancs. at Bridlington when the decision was taken to wind up the seaside operation in 1952, ended up being taken to Bond at Wythenshawe for the work to be done.

Dave Careless


15/09/13 – 16:51

Ashton’s Guy Arab IVs had 6LW engines. I get this information from a very detailed fleet list published by Ashton themselves about 1968 when the buses were part of the current fleet. As (I believe) the only Ashton buses ever fitted with a 6LW it is most unlikely they would have got that wrong. The fleet list shows withdrawn vehicles and the utility Guys are shown correctly with a 5LW engine.
Bond bodies were built on Metal Sections frames and were as good as anybody else’s. The closest connection they had to any other coach builder was Brush as the head of their bus operation had come from Brush when they moved out of the business.
One of these Guys was earmarked for preservation in early SELNEC days but a significant chassis defect meant that project was stillborn. It’s a shame as one of these would have been a fine testimony to a local coachbuilder, the sole representative being a contemporary Ashton trolleybus.

David Beilby


15/09/13 – 18:05

Phil, East Lancs did have a subsidiary business at Bridlington as the following web page confirms:- www.ebay.com/itm/  
I do, however, agree with your assessment of the situation in that any connection between Bond and East Lancs occurred purely in the course of business; there was no inter company control. I am grateful to David for endorsing my belief that these Ashton Guys had 6LW engines. The revelation that the Bond bodies were built on Metal Section frames also ties in with the visual and quality similarities to the fine Harkness products of that time.

Roger Cox


15/09/13 – 19:19

Dave, I’m a little surprised that either Coventry or Rotherham accepted tenders from the Bridlington operation of East Lancs as I always understood this arm of the operation was to be wound down from the end of 1951, thus my thought that the reference to Bridlington in the link posted by Roger was in error. If the operation was still functioning in 1952, as seems to be the case, then it’s demise must have been delayed then brought on in very short order for vehicles to be moved to Bond, implying a hasty decision and that the Blackburn operation was operating at capacity.
Again, the movement to Bond doesn’t imply any legal connection or association. As mentioned before, Bond completed orders for a number of body builders, including three of the 1953 Royal Tiger half decker airport coaches for Manchester for which Burlingham supplied the frames, the Blackpool concern completing the other three itself.
David, as I mentioned previously, I’m away from home at the moment so can’t access my own records. If 6LW engines were fitted, they would certainly have been the only ones in the fleet and from a power point of view the bigger engine, as Roger points out, would be more logical though the references I can find say 5LW. The fleet list to which you refer has long been on my “must have” list but seems to be as rare as hens’ teeth.

As a rider to the above, the Commercial Motors’ archive which often can clear up seemingly contentious issues with contemporary news items is silent on both the demise of the Bridlington operation and the Ashton order for the Arab IVs.

Phil Blinkhorn


16/09/13 – 06:28

Bond were initially active in rebuilding before they turned their hand to building new bodies. Ribble was a big customer and most memorable were the early SLT trolleybuses that were given a new lease of life at Wythenshawe.
Significantly it appears from the fleet list elsewhere on this site that the Rotherham Bristols that went to Bond were also lengthened to (almost) the recent 30-foot limit, whereas the others were rebodied and remained the original length.

David Beilby


Vehicle reminder shot for this posting


17/09/13 – 05:06

Phil, the story of East Lancashire Coachbuilders (Bridlington) Ltd., and sister company, Yorkshire Equipment Company, is a most interesting one. Apparently the latter built school furniture, desks and cupboards etc., and even constructed a furniture van body on an old Rotherham Bristol JO5G chassis with which to deliver the items to schools around the country.
Unfortunately, as orders for bus bodies and school desks inevitably dwindled, and commitment from owners wavered, the search for a buyer was unsuccessful, and both companies went into voluntary liquidation in mid-1952.

Dave Careless


19/11/13 – 18:04

In the comment above you make reference to Yorkshire Equipment being a subsidiary of East Lancs and being a school furniture maker. I had my own website back in Gocities days and had a page for makers. In doing research for Mann Egerton of Norwich, I found a US site that had school desks made by them. At one time they also made radios! Varied markets for many!

John Turnbull

Oldham Corporation – Leyland Titan PD2 – NBU 508 – 408

Oldham Corporation - Leyland Titan PD2 - NBU 508 - 408

Oldham Corporation
1957
Leyland Titan PD2/20
Crossley H33/28R

This picture shows Ashton-under-Lyne Corporation Transport XTC 855 and Oldham Corporation Passenger Transport NBU 508 in Oldham’s Wallshaw Street Depot.

NBU 508_2

The photograph shows the cast fleet number plate that was a feature of the Oldham fleet at that time.
In this view 408s Coat of Arms is on the lower deck panel, until, like Ashton, they were moved to the front upper deck panels. This was to save the costs of replacement when damage occurred due to accidents.
The Service 3 was Middleton to Rushcroft.
408 was renumbered as 5308 in the SELNEC fleet in November 1969.
The picture shows the vast expanse of the roof of Wallshaw Street depot. The Garage roof having only 3 stanchions, supporting girders with spans of over 200ft.
Ashton XTC 855 was one of the Guy Arab IVs with Bond H32/28R bodywork delivered as No. 40 in 1956. Here it has Fleet No. 68 which it received in 1964. It was renumbered 5468 at the formation of SELNEC in November 1969.
It can be seen that the Corporation crest and lettering is in the normal position before being moved to the upper deck front panel (as shown in the photograph of No. 19 in Part One – Ashton under Lyne article by Phil Blinkhorn and Roger Cox).
It is in Oldham Garage, showing Service 8 which was the joint Oldham, Ashton, & SHMD service between Oldham and Stalybridge via Hurst Cross.

Photograph and Copy contributed by Stephen Howarth


12/09/13 – 16:30

Oldham 408 was numerically the first of five Leyland PD2/20 with Crossley bodies built to Park Royal design, after the takeover by the ACV group. Similar bodies were supplied to Ashton-Under-Lyne and Stockport Corporations at this time Crossley ceased body building soon after, although not before they had built the prototype Bridgemaster, which had many similarities to this body design. The Manchester independent A. Mayne and Son had three AEC Regent V with Park Royal bodywork to the same basic design (although in 30ft length.)
These bodies proved inferior to their contemporaries of other makes, and after takeover by Selnec PTE, 409 was overhauled and lasted in service until 1973, the rest of the batch were withdrawn in 1970.
Ashton-Under-Lyne Corporation was a Leyland User, and had only the one batch of Guy Arab IV’s. These were unusual in having exposed radiators and 5LW engines, as well as the relatively rare body make. I enjoyed several rides on these interesting buses from Ashton to Mossley, this route being their usual home.
I wonder why an Ashton bus was inside Oldham’s depot? At first I wondered if it was one of the many buses hired from other operators as a result of the disastrous visit by Ministry of transport inspectors in October 1965. However David Wayman’s book on Oldham buses states that there were no Ashton buses involved. Perhaps it had broken down in Oldham.

Don McKeown


13/09/13 – 06:30

An interesting photo of a neighbouring municipality’s vehicle interloping into the home fleet’s garage. I would venture this was a relatively rare occurrence in its day unless someone can enlighten us. The photo has made me realise what an attractive design the Bond bodies were in a fairly understated way. The Guy radiator looks a bit old fashioned and puts about 10 years on the body design though. The Birmingham tin front would have made them into really stunning buses. Bolton of course had similar bodies on exposed radiator Leyland PD2’s but somehow the Leyland radiator seemed to age much better and still looked good right up to the end of Titan production.

Philip Halstead


13/09/13 – 08:30

A number of points regarding Don’s comment. The Stockport PD2s with Crossley bodies to the same design didn’t have the same problems as the Oldham batch and some were sent to Oldham after SELNEC took over. As I’m away from home at present I can’t confirm actual vehicles used and the dates but the Stockport vehicles outlasted the Oldham and Ashton batches.
The Ashton Guys were specifically bought for the Mossley route – see my article on SELNEC Part One. They appeared on the 7 and 8 from time to time, both being regular Guy turns, more frequently operated with rebodied austerity Guys sporting 7 foot 6 in versions of the Crossley body shown in the picture.
What the bus is doing in the depot is a matter of conjecture. It certainly wasn’t a 1965 swap vehicle. A breakdown is possible but as there was always one of the batch spare and it may have been filling in for a broken down Oldham vehicle which came to grief in Ashton’s territory and would have been taken to Mossley Rd. Most of the joint services in the Manchester conurbation had vehicle swap arrangements should a vehicle come to grief in the territory of another operator.

Phil Blinkhorn


13/09/13 – 08:30

I know exactly what the Ashton Guy was doing in the Oldham garage and I even have the negative of this photo (although I didn’t take it). I’ve had to look very carefully as it is quite likely that very similar photographs were also taken.
Ashton 68 was on a tour organised by the Buckley Wells Bus Enthusiasts Society. It operated on 9th July 1967 and visited several locations in north Lancashire. Thanks to Stan Fitton, who organised the tour, I have photographs of the Ashton Guy next to Todmorden PD2s, a BCN Guy and an Accrington Wulfrunian. I hope in time to put these in a gallery recounting the history of the Society as I think many will find it an interesting story.
Although both these vehicles were allocated SELNEC fleet numbers neither carried them and in fact the Oldham PD2 had been withdrawn some time before SELNEC was formed.

David Beilby


13/09/13 – 16:30

I wonder why the blind was set for route number 8? Has David thwarted a ruse set 46 years ago to confuse future enthusiasts and historians? The date was my 20th birthday and I spent the day riding buses – far away from Oldham however.
They were two shades of green, exclusively single deck and carried a coat of arms containing the letters SPQR and a crown. I have in mind an article covering my wanderings on the city and country buses I used around Rome but am having problems finding relevant photos and accurate references to exact types.

Phil Blinkhorn


14/09/13 – 06:24

XTC 854

To quote Margaret Wolfe Hungerford, “Beauty is in the eye of the Beholder”. I consider the elegant and timeless Guy radiator on the Ashton Arab IVs to be much superior in appearance to the bulbous Birmingham style tin front. The best version of the Birmingham front was that fitted to the Dennis Lance K4 which had vertical chrome strips instead of the crude sausage shaped slots. Did these Ashton Arabs really have the 5LW engine? Hitherto, I understood the power plant to be the 6LW. Gardners were always cool runners, an effective oil cooler being an important feature of the engine design. The handsome Bond bodywork exhibits several similarities with contemporary five bay East Lancashire products. Perhaps Bond used the East Lancs frame. Then again, the Harkness bodies of the period had much the same appearance, and these used MetSec frames.

Roger Cox


14/09/13 – 16:19

Roger, as you are aware, I’m away at present but my memory and the references I can find on the Net all point to the 5LW engine. Bond used various frames inc Burlingham but I’ve no knowledge of any use of East Lancs frames and I’d doubt that the Blackburn concern would have supplied frames given just about every batch built by them in the 1950s and 1960s was unique, though I take your point about resemblance, especially the frontal appearance.
The Park Bridge service was an oddity. It followed the Oldham Rd to almost the boundary with Hathershaw then turned right down a winding road to Park Bridge, a hamlet established in the 18th century around an iron works. Its timings on weekdays were based around rush hours and a late evening service. Saturday saw an enhanced daytime service for shoppers but, until the closure of the Oldham to Guide Bridge and Stockport rail services in the Beeching era, the halt at Park Bridge provided a more frequent service though Oldham Rd station at Ashton was a good ten minutes walk from the market and shops, the final 200 yards back to the station being up a quite sharp gradient. The hamlet is now a heritage site with beautifully restored houses in a rural setting.

Phil Blinkhorn


15/09/13 – 07:25

Phil, your knowledge of the operators in the Manchester locality is rewardingly comprehensive, and, as you indicated in the Ashton article, these Guys must have been purchased for a specific reason. Nonetheless, it does seem extraordinary that Ashton should specify the 7 litre, 94 bhp 5LW engine to meet a situation that distressed a 9.8 litre, 125 bhp Leyland. The Gardner would assuredly climb a proverbial brick wall without overheating, but progress must have been decidedly sedate. On the subject of the body frames used by Bond, a contributor to the following website, named T W Moore (surely the well known bus photographer) suggests that Bond was an associated company of East Lancs (see the last post on the page):- //cwk205.freeforums.org/  
Do you think that this was the case?

Roger Cox


15/09/13 – 09:36

XTC 855

The attached photo shows the Ashton Guy at the start of this tour (and all the other Buckley Wells Bus Enthusiasts tours), Manchester Victoria station. 68 has as a backdrop the long-demolished buildings on Hunt’s Bank. The coach behind is unusual as it is a Setra from the Somme Département in France, as shown by the registration which ends with the number 80. Continental coaches were a rare sight in those days.
The blinds were set to all sorts of displays during the tour (it was an opportunity to practice this much-desired but usually not permitted activity). At Ashton it showed 159, certainly not an Ashton route, and a lot of time it showed the perennial favourite but incorrect Ashton display, “10 Downing Street”, which unfortunately came out as Downing St 10. Downing Street was a short working on the 5 to Droylsden via Littlemoss.

David Beilby


15/09/13 – 14:02

On the face of it the use of the 5LW looks odd but there may have been a very logical reason – at least in the minds of the members of the Transport Committee and the General Manager. The order was placed in the period in the 1950s when diesel prices and wages had escalated rapidly putting up costs against a background of increased availability of cars, an increase in home entertainment with a widening of TV output and a resistance against increased fares all of which produced a marked decline in passenger numbers.
Small and reduced output engines were not a rare phenomenon in the area and whilst the route to Mossley may have seemed to demand a large engine, a slow plodder which completed the journey, on what was a fairly relaxed schedule, was preferable to an enforced cooling stop or even a breakdown, which had become a regular and expensive enough occurrence. No other route in the system had such demands and the 5LW would have had a more racehorse like performance on the other routes to which Ashton’s Guys were allocated and to which the vehicles would eventually be tasked. I rode on both the Leylands and the Guys and whilst I was under ten at the time the Guys took over, I have memories of their stately progress compared to the rather raucous progress of the Leylands, which included much gear changing and stuttering starts from some of the bus stops on the steeper parts of the route, not to mention the overheating.
With regard to Bond, the posting linking the company to East Lancs contains a major nonsense in so far as it places the latter in Bridlington, not once but twice – hardly a typo. Apart from its own bodies Bond did finish bodies for other manufacturers and may well have taken the strain for East Lancs with the Coventry job but, as far as I have understood the rather obscure history of the company, it was totally independent of any other bus body builder, its demise in Wythenshawe coming about after protracted labour disputes between craft unions.

Phil Blinkhorn


15/09/13 – 16:50

Roger’s information with respect to the suggestion that the S.H. Bond concern was an associate of East Lancs. would go a long way towards explaining why the remainder of a batch of nine pre-war Bristol saloons of Rotherham Corporation, of which I think four had been rebodied by East Lancs. at Bridlington when the decision was taken to wind up the seaside operation in 1952, ended up being taken to Bond at Wythenshawe for the work to be done.

Dave Careless


15/09/13 – 16:51

Ashton’s Guy Arab IVs had 6LW engines. I get this information from a very detailed fleet list published by Ashton themselves about 1968 when the buses were part of the current fleet. As (I believe) the only Ashton buses ever fitted with a 6LW it is most unlikely they would have got that wrong. The fleet list shows withdrawn vehicles and the utility Guys are shown correctly with a 5LW engine.
Bond bodies were built on Metal Sections frames and were as good as anybody else’s. The closest connection they had to any other coach builder was Brush as the head of their bus operation had come from Brush when they moved out of the business.
One of these Guys was earmarked for preservation in early SELNEC days but a significant chassis defect meant that project was stillborn. It’s a shame as one of these would have been a fine testimony to a local coachbuilder, the sole representative being a contemporary Ashton trolleybus.

David Beilby


15/09/13 – 18:05

Phil, East Lancs did have a subsidiary business at Bridlington as the following web page confirms:- www.ebay.com/itm/  
I do, however, agree with your assessment of the situation in that any connection between Bond and East Lancs occurred purely in the course of business; there was no inter company control. I am grateful to David for endorsing my belief that these Ashton Guys had 6LW engines. The revelation that the Bond bodies were built on Metal Section frames also ties in with the visual and quality similarities to the fine Harkness products of that time.

Roger Cox


15/09/13 – 19:19

Dave, I’m a little surprised that either Coventry or Rotherham accepted tenders from the Bridlington operation of East Lancs as I always understood this arm of the operation was to be wound down from the end of 1951, thus my thought that the reference to Bridlington in the link posted by Roger was in error. If the operation was still functioning in 1952, as seems to be the case, then it’s demise must have been delayed then brought on in very short order for vehicles to be moved to Bond, implying a hasty decision and that the Blackburn operation was operating at capacity.
Again, the movement to Bond doesn’t imply any legal connection or association. As mentioned before, Bond completed orders for a number of body builders, including three of the 1953 Royal Tiger half decker airport coaches for Manchester for which Burlingham supplied the frames, the Blackpool concern completing the other three itself.
David, as I mentioned previously, I’m away from home at the moment so can’t access my own records. If 6LW engines were fitted, they would certainly have been the only ones in the fleet and from a power point of view the bigger engine, as Roger points out, would be more logical though the references I can find say 5LW. The fleet list to which you refer has long been on my “must have” list but seems to be as rare as hens’ teeth.

As a rider to the above, the Commercial Motors’ archive which often can clear up seemingly contentious issues with contemporary news items is silent on both the demise of the Bridlington operation and the Ashton order for the Arab IVs.

Phil Blinkhorn


16/09/13 – 06:28

Bond were initially active in rebuilding before they turned their hand to building new bodies. Ribble was a big customer and most memorable were the early SLT trolleybuses that were given a new lease of life at Wythenshawe.
Significantly it appears from the fleet list elsewhere on this site that the Rotherham Bristols that went to Bond were also lengthened to (almost) the recent 30-foot limit, whereas the others were rebodied and remained the original length.

David Beilby


Vehicle reminder shot for this posting


17/09/13 – 05:06

Phil, the story of East Lancashire Coachbuilders (Bridlington) Ltd., and sister company, Yorkshire Equipment Company, is a most interesting one. Apparently the latter built school furniture, desks and cupboards etc., and even constructed a furniture van body on an old Rotherham Bristol JO5G chassis with which to deliver the items to schools around the country.
Unfortunately, as orders for bus bodies and school desks inevitably dwindled, and commitment from owners wavered, the search for a buyer was unsuccessful, and both companies went into voluntary liquidation in mid-1952.

Dave Careless


19/11/13 – 18:04

In the comment above you make reference to Yorkshire Equipment being a subsidiary of East Lancs and being a school furniture maker. I had my own website back in Gocities days and had a page for makers. In doing research for Mann Egerton of Norwich, I found a US site that had school desks made by them. At one time they also made radios! Varied markets for many!

John Turnbull